With 71% Ownership of the Shares, International Bancshares Corporation (NASDAQ:IBOC) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 71% Ownership of the Shares, International Bancshares Corporation (NASDAQ:IBOC) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, International Bancshares' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,International Bancshares的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前十大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
A look at the shareholders of International Bancshares Corporation (NASDAQ:IBOC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看International Bancshares Corporation (納斯達克:IBOC)的股東可以讓我們了解哪個群體最有權勢。機構持有71%的股份,控制了公司最多的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到他們掌握的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有重要影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,投資於公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about International Bancshares.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於International Bancshares的情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About International Bancshares?
機構投資者的股份相對較多,這意味着爲這些機構服務的分析師們看好股票。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能看錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得關注的是國際班克股份以下的收入歷史數據,當然未來才是真正的關鍵。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in International Bancshares. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at International Bancshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在International Bancshares中擁有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們對此表示認可。但是,就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看看International Bancshares的營業收入歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. International Bancshares is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的超過一半股份,因此他們可以共同施加顯著的影響力。International Bancshares並不被對沖基金持有。貝萊德公司目前是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。先鋒集團和維度基金顧問則分別持有10%和6.0%的流通股份,成爲第二和第三大股東。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了一些深入研究,發現十大股東約佔股東名冊的51%,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒同樣重要,以了解市場的動向。我們的信息表明,這隻股票並沒有任何分析師覆蓋,因此可能不爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of International Bancshares
雖然了解公司擁有的不同群體很有價值,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,您應該注意我們已經發現的1個國際班克的警告信號。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in International Bancshares Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$354m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有國際銀行股份公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,所以看到一些可能有意義的對齊通常是一個積極的信號。在這種情況下,他們持有約35400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人士對齊的問題,可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在這家公司中擁有20%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種股權規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand International Bancshares better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - International Bancshares has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是有益的。但是爲了更好地理解International Bancshares,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,風險 - International Bancshares有1個警示信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。