RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RLI's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由於機構在股票中持有大量股份,RLI的股票價格可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前12大股東持有公司的50%股份。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
A look at the shareholders of RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看RLI保險(紐交所:RLI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最強大。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有絕大部分股份,持股比例達到81%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該團體將獲得最大利益(如果出現下跌,他們將損失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about RLI.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於RLI的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RLI?
機構持股告訴我們關於RLI什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in RLI. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at RLI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在RLI中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股票價格可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得關注下面RLI的營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in RLI. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 8.0% of the stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以集體發揮重要作用。我們注意到,對RLI的對沖基金並沒有進行有意義的投資。先鋒集團目前是最大股東,持有10.0%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約9.6%和8.0%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記,我們可以看到前12位股東控制了50%的股份,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of RLI
RLI內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in RLI Corp.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$294m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會感興趣地了解到,內部人士在RLI保險中擁有股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的利益一致是很好的。內部人士持有價值29400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說這表明了股東與董事會之間利益的一致性。不過,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有賣出股份。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in RLI. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有RLI 15%的股份。這個股權規模雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for RLI that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如,我們發現了RLI保險的一個警告信號,在您投資之前應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。