Warren Buffett Says Buy S&P 500, But This Tech Investor Warns Of A 'Rude Awakening'
Warren Buffett Says Buy S&P 500, But This Tech Investor Warns Of A 'Rude Awakening'
Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has questioned the long-standing advice of Warren Buffett to invest in low-fee S&P 500 index funds. Palihapitiya warns of potential risks due to the index's heavy concentration in a few tech stocks.
風險投資家查馬斯·帕利哈皮蒂亞質疑禾倫·巴菲特長期以來提出的投資低費用標準普爾500指數基金的建議。Palihapitiya警告說,由於該指數高度集中在少數科技股上,存在潛在風險。
What Happened: Buffett has consistently recommended that the average person invest in a low-fee S&P 500 index fund and hold it for the long term.
發生了什麼:巴菲特一直建議普通人投資低費用的標準普爾500指數基金並長揸。
However, Palihapitiya, co-host of the "All-In" podcast, contends that a handful of tech stocks have become so valuable that owning the S&P 500 is essentially a concentrated bet on these risky businesses.
但是,「All-In」 播客的聯合主持人帕利哈皮蒂亞認爲,少數科技股已經變得如此有價值,以至於擁有標準普爾500指數本質上是對這些風險企業的集中押注。
Palihapitiya's concern is that the top 10 most valuable S&P 500 companies, including Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA), and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), account for nearly 40% of the benchmark index's total market cap. This, he argues, contradicts the diversification principle that underpins index investing.
帕利哈皮蒂亞擔心的是,標普500指數前十大最有價值的公司,包括蘋果公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AAPL)、英偉達公司(納斯達克股票代碼:NVDA)和微軟公司(納斯達克股票代碼:MSFT),佔基準指數總市值的近40%。他認爲,這與支撐指數投資的多元化原則相矛盾。
"When you buy an index of 500 companies, you're really buying 10 companies with 490 others thrown in," Palihapitiya said in the X post on Saturday.
帕利哈皮蒂亞在週六的X帖子中說:「當你買入500家公司的指數時,你實際上是在買入10家公司,還有490家公司。」
Also Read: Warren Buffett's Timeless Advice For Investing $10,000: 'If You're Gonna Do Dumb Things Because Your Stock Goes Down, You Shouldn't Own A Stock At All'
另請閱讀:禾倫·巴菲特關於投資1萬美元的永恒建議:「如果你因爲股票下跌而要做愚蠢的事情,那麼你根本不應該擁有股票」
"Average Americans buy S&P 500 index ETFs, in part, because Buffett told them to. They were told they would pay very little and get diversification in the 500 best companies on earth to ride out storms," he said in the post.
「普通美國人購買標準普爾500指數ETF,部分原因是巴菲特要求他們這樣做。他們被告知,他們將支付很少的費用,並在全球500家最好的公司中實現多元化,以渡過難關。」 他在帖子中說。
"That's ok if you're a "professional" and that's what you are betting on but most ETF buyers aren't professional stock traders and they will be in for a rude awakening if this isn't addressed," Palihapitiya wrote.
帕利哈皮蒂亞寫道:「如果你是 「專業人士」,那沒關係,這也是你所押注的,但是大多數ETF買家都不是專業的股票交易者,如果這個問題得不到解決,他們就會粗魯地覺醒。」
He warns that if these tech giants take a hit, investors could face significant losses, as their portfolios won't be sufficiently cushioned by other holdings.
他警告說,如果這些科技巨頭受到打擊,投資者可能會面臨重大損失,因爲他們的投資組合將無法得到其他持股的足夠緩衝。
Why It Matters: Palihapitiya's critique of Buffett's investment strategy comes amidst his own controversial promotion of high-risk special purpose acquisition deals, or SPACs, during the pandemic.
爲何重要:帕利哈皮蒂亞對巴菲特投資策略的批評是在他本人在疫情期間對高風險特殊目的收購協議(SPAC)的有爭議的宣傳中提出的。
Buffett, on the other hand, has largely avoided tech stocks throughout his career, focusing on value investing within his circle of competence.
另一方面,巴菲特在他的職業生涯中基本上避開了科技股,專注於在自己的能力範圍內進行價值投資。
This divergence in investment approaches underscores the ongoing debate about the role of tech stocks in portfolio diversification and the potential risks associated with over-reliance on a few high-performing companies.
投資方法的這種分歧凸顯了關於科技股在投資組合多元化中的作用以及與過度依賴少數表現良好的公司相關的潛在風險的持續爭論。
Read Next
繼續閱讀
How Warren Buffett Decides When To Sell a Stock: 'If the Competitive Advantage Disappears...We Sell'
禾倫·巴菲特如何決定何時出售股票:「如果競爭優勢消失... 我們就賣出」
This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
該內容部分是在人工智能工具的幫助下製作的,並由Benzinga編輯審閱和發佈。