Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603200) Market Cap up CN¥430m Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 48% as Well as Insiders
Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603200) Market Cap up CN¥430m Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 48% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 50% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- Insiders own 43% of Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech
- 零售投資者在上海洗霸的持股比例可觀,表明他們在管理和業務策略方面擁有更大的發言權。
- 前9大股東持有50%的股份
- 內部人士持有上海洗霸43%的股份。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech Co., Ltd (SHSE:603200), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着上海洗霸股份有限公司(SHSE:603200),了解公司的持股結構非常重要。我們可以看到,零售投資者在公司中擁有48%的股份。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大程度的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 11% price gain, insiders also received a 43% cut.
雖然散戶投資者是上週價格上漲11%後獲得最大收益的群體,但內部人也獲得了43%的收益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於上海洗霸的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech?
機構持股情況對上海洗霸的意義是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
上海洗霸在股份登記中已經有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。不過,我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時候也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看下面上海洗霸的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Wei Wang with 41% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Shanghai Tiancheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Invest Equity Investment & Management Co., Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 2.0%.
對沖基金在上海洗霸的股份不多。根據我們的數據,最大股東是CEO王偉,佔有41%的流通股。第二和第三大股東分別是上海天成投資管理有限公司和浙江投資股權投資與管理有限公司,他們各自的股份比例爲2.0%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經進一步檢查,我們發現公司的股份超過一半由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上受到較小股東的平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的觀點以了解市場風向同樣是有意義的。雖然有分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech
上海洗霸的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shanghai Emperor of Cleaning Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. Insiders have a CN¥1.8b stake in this CN¥4.3b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在上海洗霸科技有限公司持有顯著股份。內部人士在這個價值 CN¥43億 的企業中持有 CN¥18億 的股份。看到內部人士如此投入於業務中真是太好了。可能值得查看一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 48% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,包括零售投資者,持有公司的48%股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種 ownership 在一定程度上很可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張互動圖表,查看過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。