With 74% Ownership of the Shares, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 74% Ownership of the Shares, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lockheed Martin's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 高機構所有權意味着洛克希德·馬丁公司的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 共有8名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
- 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
If you want to know who really controls Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了洛克希德·馬丁公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:LMT),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲74%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構可以獲得大量資本,因此其市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lockheed Martin, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究洛克希德·馬丁公司的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lockheed Martin?
關於洛克希德·馬丁公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lockheed Martin. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lockheed Martin, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所見,機構投資者持有洛克希德·馬丁公司的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看洛克希德·馬丁公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lockheed Martin. The company's largest shareholder is State Street Global Advisors, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Lockheed Martin Corporation, ESOP is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 9.1% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在洛克希德·馬丁公司的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是道富環球顧問公司,所有權爲15%。洛克希德·馬丁公司,ESOP是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約9.1%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們又進行了一些挖掘,發現8位最大股東約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Lockheed Martin
洛克希德·馬丁公司的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lockheed Martin Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$58m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有洛克希德·馬丁公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值5800萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Lockheed Martin. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有洛克希德·馬丁公司14%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Lockheed Martin .
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在洛克希德·馬丁公司發現的1個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。