With 86% Ownership, The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 86% Ownership, The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Progressive's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構在股票中的大額股份,Progressive的股價可能會受到他們交易決定的影響。
- 前25大股東擁有公司51%的股份
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
A look at the shareholders of The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 86% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看The Progressive Corporation(紐交所:PGR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔86%,是機構。也就是說,該群體在股票上漲時將受益最多(或者在出現下跌時損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到他們掌握的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有重要影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,投資於公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Progressive.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Progressive的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Progressive?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於Progressive的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Progressive does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Progressive, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Progressive確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注過股票,並且他們對其表示看好。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售某隻股票,股票價格大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,檢查一下Progressive過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Progressive. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.0% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 4.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在Progressive的股份不多。先鋒集團目前是公司最大的股東,持有9.0%的流通股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.2%和4.2%的流通股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 25 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前25名股東在公司中的總持股比例爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有顯著控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Progressive
Progressive的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Progressive Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$405m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士以個人名義持有的進步公司股份不足1%。由於這是一家大型公司,我們只期望內部人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值40500萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部持股總是好的,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這一群體未必能主導決策,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真實影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Progressive has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲取洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。拿風險來說——我們認爲Progressive有2個警告信號你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。