Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as StoneCo Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:STNE) Recent 3.5% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as StoneCo Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:STNE) Recent 3.5% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, StoneCo's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 由於機構對該股票的重大持股,StoneCo的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 共有13位投資者在公司中持有51%的多數股份。
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of StoneCo Ltd. (NASDAQ:STNE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 75% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
爲了了解誰真正控制StoneCo Ltd.(納斯達克:STNE),了解業務的股權結構至關重要。而持有最大份額的團體是機構,佔有75%的股份。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$86m. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 52% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in StoneCo's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
因此,機構投資者在上週遭受了最高的損失,市值下降了8600萬美元。 不用說,最近的損失進一步增加了股東一年的52%的損失,這對這一類股東來說可能不好。 機構投資者常被稱爲「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有重大權力。 因此,如果StoneCo的股價繼續走弱,機構投資者可能感到有必要賣出股票,這對個人投資者來說可能不理想。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of StoneCo, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解StoneCo的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About StoneCo?
機構所有權告訴我們關於StoneCo的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
StoneCo already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at StoneCo's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
StoneCo的股東名冊上已經有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好要警惕依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,查看StoneCo的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in StoneCo. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.5% and 5.0% of the stock.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,他們可以強有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到對StoneCo的對沖基金投資並不顯著。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是貝萊德公司,持有10%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約8.5%和5.0%的股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前13大股東在公司中的合計持股比例爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of StoneCo
StoneCo的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in StoneCo Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$86m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有StoneCo Ltd.的股份。內部人士持有價值8600萬美元的重要股份。大多數人會將這視爲一個真正的積極因素。看到內部人士有這樣的投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 5.2%, of the StoneCo stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司擁有StoneCo股票的5.2%。僅憑這個事實很難得出結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的所有者。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過一個獨立的私人公司對一家上市公司的股份有利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for StoneCo that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同 groups 是值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了一個你應該關注的StoneCo的警告信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。