Genting Singapore Limited (SGX:G13) Stock Most Popular Amongst Public Companies Who Own 53%, While Individual Investors Hold 37%
Genting Singapore Limited (SGX:G13) Stock Most Popular Amongst Public Companies Who Own 53%, While Individual Investors Hold 37%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Genting Singapore's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- Genting Berhad owns 53% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Genting Singapore is 10%
- 雲頂新加坡擁有大量上市公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 雲頂有限公司擁有該公司53%的股份
- 新加坡雲頂的機構所有權爲10%
Every investor in Genting Singapore Limited (SGX:G13) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 53% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
雲頂新加坡有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:G13)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有53%所有權的上市公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
And individual investors on the other hand have a 37% ownership in the company.
另一方面,個人投資者擁有該公司37%的所有權。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Genting Singapore.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關雲頂新加坡的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genting Singapore?
關於新加坡雲頂,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Genting Singapore. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Genting Singapore's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者持有新加坡雲頂的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到新加坡雲頂的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。
Genting Singapore is not owned by hedge funds. Genting Berhad is currently the company's largest shareholder with 53% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 1.9% and 1.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
新加坡雲頂不歸對沖基金所有。雲頂有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的53%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。Vanguard Group, Inc.和貝萊德公司分別擁有1.9%和1.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Genting Singapore
新加坡雲頂的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Genting Singapore Limited. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$38m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有雲頂新加坡有限公司不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值3800萬新元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in Genting Singapore. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有新加坡雲頂37%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 53% of the Genting Singapore shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有雲頂新加坡已發行股票的53%。我們無法確定,但這很可能是一個戰略利益。這些企業可能是相似的,也可以是合作的。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Genting Singapore that you should be aware of.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了新加坡雲頂的一個警告標誌,你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。