share_log

Retail Investors Are Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300440) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥387m

Retail Investors Are Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300440) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥387m

散戶投資者是運達科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300440)最大的股東,在市值下跌387萬人民幣後受到了打擊
Simply Wall St ·  01/03 08:16

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Chengdu Yunda Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Institutions own 11% of Chengdu Yunda Technology
  • 零售投資者在運達科技的顯著持股表明,他們在管理和業務策略上集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有10位投資者持有公司超過50%的股份
  • 機構持有運達科技11%的股份

Every investor in Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300440) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位在運達科技有限公司(深交所代碼:300440)的投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,零售投資者在公司中擁有47%的股份佔比。換句話說,該群體在對公司的投資中將獲得最多(或失去最多)的收益。

And last week, retail investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 11%.

上週,散戶投資者面臨了最大的損失,因爲股票下跌了11%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chengdu Yunda Technology.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於運達科技的不同股東群體。

big
SZSE:300440 Ownership Breakdown January 3rd 2025
深交所:300440 股權結構 2025年1月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Yunda Technology?

機構持股對我們了解運達科技有什麼啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Chengdu Yunda Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu Yunda Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在運達科技中擁有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師關注了這隻股票,並且喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,值得查看運達科技過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:300440 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 3rd 2025
深交所:300440 盈利和營業收入增長 2025年1月3日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu Yunda Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Yunda Innovative (Chengdu) Investment Co., Ltd. with 34% of shares outstanding. With 5.5% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wanglong Li and Hengqin Guangjin Meihao Fund Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到對運達科技的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,最大股東是運達創新(成都)投資有限公司,持有34%的流通股。王龍和橫琴廣金美昊基金管理有限公司分別持有5.5%和5.0%的流通股,分別是第二和第三大股東。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了一些深入調查,發現十大股東大約佔註冊股份的50%,這意味着除了大股東之外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構持股能爲您的研究增值,但研究分析師的建議也是一種良好的做法,可以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何分析師對該股票的覆蓋,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Yunda Technology

運達科技的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥193m worth of the CN¥3.3b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會感興趣地了解到,內部人士擁有運達科技有限公司的股份。作爲個體,內部人士總共擁有價值19300萬元人民幣的股份,而該公司市值爲33億元人民幣。有些人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致。但值得查看的是這些內部人士是否有在賣出股份。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有公司47%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。 儘管這種所有權比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 36%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司持有36%的流通股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私營公司的所有者。有時候,內部人士或其他相關方通過一家單獨的私營公司對一家上市公司的股份感興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Chengdu Yunda Technology (at least 1 which is potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現研究誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,投資風險始終存在。我們已經確定了運達科技的4個警告信號(其中至少1個可能是嚴重的),理解這些信號應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您也可能會在其他地方找到一個絕佳的投資。請查看這個免費的有趣公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論