Private Companies Among Guangdong Misun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301577) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 13% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Guangdong Misun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301577) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 13% Price Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Guangdong Misun Technology's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 55% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Guangdong Misun Technology is 12%
- 廣東美信科技的私人公司大量持股表明,主要決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
- 55%的業務由前兩個股東持有。
- 廣東美信科技的機構持股比例爲12%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Guangdong Misun Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301577), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了廣東美信科技有限公司(SZSE:301577),了解該公司的股權結構至關重要。持有公司最多股份的集團大約佔56%,也就是說,私人公司持有這些股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 13%.
上週,私營公司遭受了最大損失,股票下跌了13%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Guangdong Misun Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於廣東美信科技的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Misun Technology?
機構的所有權告訴我們關於廣東美信科技什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Guangdong Misun Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Guangdong Misun Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到廣東美信科技確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經審查過這隻股票,並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。因此,如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,看到大幅下跌的股價並不罕見。因此,查看廣東美信科技過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangdong Misun Technology. Shenzhen Quanzhen Investment Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 46% of shares outstanding. Dongguan Tongxin Industrial Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and China Resources Capital Management Limited holds about 4.7% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Dingzhen Zhang directly holds 2.8% of the total shares outstanding.
對沖基金在廣東美訊科技的股份不多。 深圳全真投資有限公司目前是最大股東,持有46%的流通股份。 東莞通信產業投資合夥企業(有限合夥)是第二大股東,持有8.6%的普通股,中國資源資本管理有限公司持有約4.7%的公司股票。 此外,公司CEO張鼎真直接持有總流通股份的2.8%.
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構持股情況是評估和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師情緒也能達到同樣的效果。我們的信息顯示該股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,因此可能不爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Misun Technology
廣東美訊科技的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Guangdong Misun Technology Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥71m worth of the CN¥2.5b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到,內部人士持有廣東米孫科技有限公司的股份。作爲個人,這些內部人士 collectively 持有價值7100萬元的公司股份,總價值爲25億元。有些人可能會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但檢查一下這些內部人士是否在賣出也是很有必要的。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有29%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。這種規模的股權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 56%, of the Guangdong Misun Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司擁有廣東美訊科技56%的股票。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的所有者。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過一家獨立的私人公司在一家上市公司中持有股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Guangdong Misun Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Guangdong Misun Technology has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解廣東美訊科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例——廣東美訊科技有3個預警信號(還有1個令人擔憂的信號)我們認爲你應該知道。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更傾向於查看另一家公司——一家有潛在優越財務狀況的公司——那麼請不要錯過這份由強大財務數據支持的有趣公司免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。