Individual Investors Are Hangzhou Sunrise Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300360) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥550m
Individual Investors Are Hangzhou Sunrise Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300360) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥550m
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- 23% of Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd is held by insiders
- 個人投資者在炬華科技有限公司的擁有權表明,他們在管理和業務策略方面具有更大的發言權。
- 前8大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
- 23%的炬華科技有限公司股份由內部人士持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hangzhou Sunrise Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300360), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 40% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
爲了了解誰真正控制着炬華科技有限公司(深交所代碼:300360),理解公司的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到,個人投資者在公司中擁有40%的股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或承擔最多的損失)。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 6.2% price drop, insiders with their 23% also suffered.
儘管個人投資者在上週6.2%的價格下跌後持有的股份受到了影響,但持有23%的內部人員也遭受了損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於炬華科技有限公司的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於炬華科技有限公司的哪些信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
炬華科技有限公司已經有機構在股份登記冊上。實際上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在着「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會爭先恐後地快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到炬華科技有限公司的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,總是有更多的故事。

Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Hangzhou Sunrise Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 4.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Guang Yang is the owner of 2.6% of the company's shares.
炬華科技有限公司不被對沖基金持有。 昇興股份有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有21%的流通股份。 同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有12%和4.0%的流通股份。 此外,首席執行官楊光持有公司2.6%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更多的挖掘,發現前8大股東大約佔登記的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd
炬華科技有限公司的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hangzhou Sunrise Technology Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥8.3b, and insiders have CN¥1.9b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有炬華科技有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲83億人民幣,內部人士名下的股份價值達19億人民幣。這相當重要。大多數人會說,這顯示出與股東之間良好的對齊程度,特別是在這樣規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆一般是指個人投資者,他們在炬華科技有限公司持有40%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營企業擁有21%的已發行股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此有必要研究這些私營公司的所有者。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過一家獨立的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hangzhou Sunrise TechnologyLtd you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解炬華科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們發現炬華科技有1個警告信號您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。