Inner Mongolia First Machinery Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600967) Last Week's 4.6% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Inner Mongolia First Machinery Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600967) Last Week's 4.6% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 57% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 內蒙一機的私人公司持有 considerable ownership,表明它們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
- 共有2名投資者在公司中擁有57%的控股權
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
Every investor in Inner Mongolia First Machinery Group Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600967) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 45% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位投資者都應該意識到內蒙一機股份有限公司(SHSE:600967)最強有力的股東群體。私人公司擁有45%的股份,持有公司最多的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.6%.
上週,私營企業遭受了最大的損失,股票下跌了4.6%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討一下內蒙一機有限公司的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd?
機構持有揭示了什麼關於內蒙一機有限公司的信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在內蒙一機有限公司中持有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時候也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構持有同一只股票時,總是存在它們在進行「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到內蒙一機有限公司的歷史利潤和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd. Our data shows that China North Industries Group Corporation Limited is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. North Industries Group Investment Management Company LTD. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and China Southern Asset Management Co., Ltd. holds about 1.3% of the company stock.
我們注意到對內蒙一機的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,中國北方工業集團有限公司是最大的股東,持有45%的流通股。北方工業集團投資管理有限公司是第二大股東,擁有12%的普通股,而中國南方資產管理有限公司持有約1.3%的公司股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd
內蒙古一機有限公司的內部人持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Inner Mongolia First Machinery Group Co.,Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥12m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士在內蒙一機公司的持股不到1%。但是,他們可能通過我們尚未捕捉到的公司結構間接擁有權益。該公司規模相當大,因此董事會成員可能在公司中擁有實質性權益,而不需要擁有相稱的股份。在這種情況下,他們大約擁有價值1200萬人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得檢查那些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆以37%的持股比例,主要由個人投資者組成,對內蒙一機有限公司有一定的影響力。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上集體發揮作用。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 12%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
持有12%的股份,股權投資公司有能力在創造價值的重點上發揮作用,塑造企業策略。有時我們看到股權投資公司會長期存在,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,並且如名稱所示,較少投資於公共公司。在一段時間後,他們可能會考慮賣出並將資本重新投入到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 45%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有45%的公司股份。從這一事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的所有者。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司對一個上市公司的股份感興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Inner Mongolia First Machinery GroupLtd (1 is potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮不同的股東群體總是值得的。但是爲了更好地理解內蒙一機,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了內蒙一機的兩個警告信號(其中一個潛在嚴重!),在這裏投資之前你應該注意這些。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。