The D. E. Shaw Group Releases Open Letter to the Board of Directors of Air Products and Chemicals
The D. E. Shaw Group Releases Open Letter to the Board of Directors of Air Products and Chemicals
Expresses Disappointment with the Board's Failure to Manage an Effective CEO Succession Process
對董事會未能有效管理首席執行官繼任過程表示失望
Announces Intention to Support Change at the 2025 Annual Meeting
宣佈將在2025年年度會議上支持變革的意圖
NEW YORK, Jan. 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The D. E. Shaw group ("D. E. Shaw"), a global investment and technology development firm with more than $65 billion in investment capital and a history of working with companies to help build long-term value, today sent an open letter to the Board of Directors of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE: APD) (the "Company" or "Air Products") expressing continued disappointment with the Board's failure to manage an effective CEO succession process.
紐約,2025年1月3日/PRNewswire/ -- D.E. Shaw集團("D.E. Shaw"),一家全球投資和科技開發公司,擁有超過650億的投資資本,並且有與公司合作以幫助建立長期價值的歷史,今天向空氣產品與化學品公司(NYSE: APD)("公司"或"空氣產品")的董事會發出了公開信,表達了對董事會未能有效管理首席執行官繼任過程的持續失望。
The text of today's open letter to the Board follows:
今天致董事會的公開信內容如下:
Board of Directors
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
1940 Air Products Boulevard
Allentown, PA 18106-5500
董事會
空氣產品與化學公司
1940空氣產品大道
賓夕法尼亞州阿倫鎮, PA 18106-5500
Dear Members of the Board:
尊敬的董事會成員:
We are writing to express our continued disappointment in your failure to address shortcomings in Air Products' corporate governance that have led to a multi-year pattern of value destruction driven by the Company's current CEO, Seifi Ghasemi.
我們寫信表示對你們未能解決空氣產品公司企業治理缺陷的持續失望,這導致了由公司現任CEO Seifi Ghasemi 引發的多年價值破壞模式。
Mr. Ghasemi's seemingly unfettered decision-making authority, for which the Board is directly responsible, has led to the Company's high risk capital allocation strategy and longstanding share price underperformance relative to industry benchmarks. For years, Mr. Ghasemi appears to have gone virtually unchecked as he normalized the practice of committing to multi-billion-dollar projects without securing offtake partners—an uncharacteristically risky strategy for an industrial gas company—leading to billions of shareholder value destruction in the process. It was no surprise, then, to see Air Products' share price respond favorably to the prospect of a shareholder-driven change in leadership and strategy, nor was it a surprise to see the share price subsequently give back a substantial portion of its gains relative to peers and the broader market as it became clear that the Board was determined to resist value-enhancing change.1
Ghasemi先生似乎不受限制的決策權,董事會對此直接負責,導致了公司高風險的資本分配策略,以及長期以來,股價相對於行業基準的表現不佳。多年來,Ghasemi先生似乎幾乎沒有受到制約,他將承諾數十億美元項目的做法常態化,而沒有確保銷售合作伙伴——這對於一家工業氣體公司而言是一個不尋常的高風險策略——從而導致了數十億股東價值的損失。因此,看到空氣產品公司的股價對股東推動的領導和策略變革的前景作出積極反應並不令人驚訝,但當董事會堅定阻止增值變革時,股價隨後相對於同行公司和更廣泛市場回吐 substantial 部分收益也並不意外。
Holding a CEO accountable for their performance and planning for their succession are among the most important responsibilities of any Board. Indeed, the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines list succession first among the Board's functions, specifying that the Board is responsible for "selecting, evaluating, compensating and planning for the succession of the CEO."2 This Board is failing at its core responsibilities, which, in our view, is a direct contributor to the substantial underperformance in the Company's shares over a multi-year period.
追究CEO績效併爲其接班做好計劃是任何董事會最重要的職責之一。事實上,公司的企業治理指南將接班計劃列爲董事會職能中的第一項,規定董事會負責「選擇、評估、補償和規劃CEO的接班」。這個董事會在其核心責任上失敗了,在我們看來,這是公司股票在多年期間大幅表現不佳的直接原因。
Failed Succession Process Contributes to Longstanding Underperformance
失敗的接班流程助長了長期表現不佳
In our meeting with members of the Board in October 2024, and in materials we delivered to the Board before that meeting, we expressed our grave concern with the Company's CEO succession process.
在2024年10月與董事會成員的會議中,以及在會上之前我們向董事會提交的材料中,我們表達了對公司CEO接班流程的嚴重關切。
First, the Board appears to have initially ceded control of the Company's succession process to the Company's current CEO, Seifi Ghasemi. In August 2024, Mr. Ghasemi, indicated that he—not the Board—was undertaking succession planning: "I have decided to bring into the company [my]... successor." As if to underscore the point, he added, "I have started this process."3 Worse still, Mr. Ghasemi characterized his leading role as good governance.4
首先,董事會似乎最初將公司的接班人過程控制權交給了公司現任首席執行官Seifi Ghasemi。2024年8月,Ghasemi先生表示, he——不是董事會——正在進行接班人規劃:"I 已經決定帶入公司[我的]...接班人。"彷彿爲強調這一點,他補充道,"I 已經開始了這個過程。"更糟的是,Ghasemi先生將他主導的角色描述爲良好的治理。
Second, the Board has failed to provide a clear timeline for transitioning the CEO role (and for Mr. Ghasemi's retirement)—which is particularly concerning given Mr. Ghasemi's age and his Board-approved evergreen employment contract. Despite being the second-oldest CEO in the S&P 500 (and oldest without a named successor), Mr. Ghasemi made clear that a leadership transition was not imminent, stating that he "fully intend[ed] to continue leading Air Products"5 and that a leadership transition would occur only "if something unexpected were to happen"6 to him.
其次,董事會未能提供首席執行官角色轉移的明確時間表(以及Ghasemi先生退休的時間表)——鑑於Ghasemi先生的年齡及其董事會批准的永久就業合同,這尤其令人擔憂。儘管Ghasemi先生是S&P 500中第二年長的首席執行官(沒有指定接班人的最高年齡),但他明確表示領導層的過渡並不迫在眉睫,稱他"完全打算繼續領導Air Products",並表示領導層的過渡只會在"如果發生意外情況"6時才會發生。
The Board, not Mr. Ghasemi, should have firm and direct control of this process and its timing. That is why, in our meeting in October, we urged the Board to take a central role by publicly disclosing its approach and timeline for CEO succession. Nearly three months have gone by since our meeting and no such details have been disclosed.
董事會,而不是Ghasemi先生,應該對這一過程及其時間有明確和直接的控制。這就是爲什麼在我們十月份的會議中,我們敦促董事會公開披露其首席執行官繼任的方針和時間表。自我們會議以來已經過去近三個月,但沒有披露任何此類細節。
The Board Has Continued to Give Shareholders Inadequate Information Regarding Succession
董事會持續提供不足夠的信息給股東關於繼任的問題
In its 64-page investor presentation released in conjunction with the ongoing proxy contest, the Company devoted just a single slide to the topic of CEO succession. And while the Company has indicated that it "anticipates" announcing a "new President" no later than March 31, 2025, the Company still has not provided a timeline for appointing a new CEO or for Mr. Ghasemi's retirement.
在與正在進行的委託爭奪戰相關的64頁投資者演示文稿中,公司僅用一張幻燈片討論首席執行官繼任的話題。儘管公司表示「預計」在2025年3月31日前將宣佈一位「新主席」,但公司仍未提供任命新首席執行官或Ghasemi先生退休的時間表。
Shareholders should not have to wait until after casting their votes at the Annual Meeting to learn when the Board intends to name a new CEO and whether the Board intends for Mr. Ghasemi to remain on the Board (e.g., as Executive Chairman) or fully retire. Indeed, despite the brief attention given to this topic in the Company's presentation, future leadership of the Company and the process by which the Board will identify and recruit that new leader is the key issue in our view for shareholders to consider as they cast their ballots. Shareholders should have been given ample time before the Annual Meeting to evaluate the CEO candidate and succession timeline proposed by the Board and to make an informed judgment.
股東不應在年度會議投票後等待,才能了解董事會打算何時任命新首席執行官,以及董事會是否打算讓Ghasemi先生繼續留在董事會(例如,擔任執行董事長)或完全退休。事實上,儘管在公司演示中對這個話題給予的關注很少,但我們認爲,公司未來的領導層以及董事會將如何識別和招募新領導者的過程是股東在投票時考慮的關鍵問題。股東在年度會議之前應有充足的時間評估董事會提議的首席執行官候選人和繼任時間表,以便做出明智的判斷。
Large Air Products shareholders have publicly highlighted that CEO succession is a critical function for any board | |||
Vanguard 9.6% ownership |
"One of the most important responsibilities of a board is to select and appoint a company's EO. When we identify that a board has not appropriately carried out its responsibilities... regarding CEO succession planning... the funds may not support the election of relevant directors to express governance and oversight concerns" - Vanguard Investment Stewardship Voting Insights, June 2023 |
State Street 4.3% ownership |
"In order to carry out their primary responsibilities, directors undertake activities that include...selecting the CEO and other senior executives... creating a succession plan for the board and management" - State Street Global Proxy Voting and Engagement Policy, March 2024 |
BlackRock 8.0% ownership |
"Companies should have a robust CEO and senior management succession plan in place at the board level that is reviewed and updated on a regular basis... Where there is significant concern regarding the board's succession planning efforts, we may vote against members of the responsible committee..." - BlackRock Proxy Voting Guidelines for U.S. securities, 2024 |
J.P. Morgan 2.7% ownership |
"The responsibilities of the [Nominating] Committee should include... maintaining formal and transparent arrangements for succession planning at the... senior management level." - JP Morgan Asset Management, Corporate Governance Principles and Proxy Voting Guidelines, February 2021 |
Note(s): |
大型空氣產品的股東公開強調,首席執行官的繼任是任何董事會的一項關鍵職能。 | |||
先鋒 9.6%的股權 |
“作爲董事會最重要的職責之一是選拔和任命公司的首席執行官 當我們發現某個董事會未能適當履行其職責,關於首席執行官接班計劃時, 所有基金類型可能不會支持相關董事的選舉,以表達治理和監督的關注" - 先鋒投資管理投票洞察,2023年6月 |
State Street 4.3%的股份 |
"爲了履行他們的主要職責,董事進行的活動包括...選擇首席執行官和其他高級管理人員... 制定董事會和管理層的繼任計劃" - 道富銀行全球代理投票和參與政策,2024年3月 |
貝萊德 8.0% 的股份 |
“公司應該 在董事會層面制定一個強有力的CEO和高級管理層接班計劃 並定期進行審查和更新... 如果對董事會的接班計劃存在重大擔憂,我們可能會投票反對負責委員會的成員..." - 貝萊德2024年美國證券代理投票指南 |
摩根大通 2.7%的所有權 |
"[提名]委員會的職責應包括... 在......高層管理層維持正式和透明的接班計劃安排." - 摩根大通資產管理公司,企業治理原則及代理投票指南,2021年2月 |
注: |
Path Forward Requires Substantial Board and Leadership Change
前進的道路需要實質性的董事會和領導層變更
It appears to us that the incumbent directors have failed to develop, oversee, and communicate a timely and appropriate succession process and should not be entrusted to oversee this critical function. There is no doubt that the timing and selection of a new executive leader will have profound implications for the Company, its strategy, and its capital allocation going forward. Mr. Ghasemi has been given too much authority, and the Board has remained too passive and abdicated its responsibility to shareholders.
我們認爲,現任董事未能開發、監督並傳達及時且適當的接班流程,不應被委以監督這一關鍵職能的責任。毫無疑問,新任執行領導者的時間和選擇將對公司、其策略以及未來的資本配置產生深遠影響。Ghasemi先生被賦予了過多權力,而董事會則過於被動,放棄了對股東的責任。
Change in the Board's composition, including Mr. Ghasemi's retirement from it, is urgently needed to ensure the Board properly fulfills this most important function.
董事會的組成變化,包括Ghasemi先生的退休,是確保董事會妥當地履行這一最重要職能的緊迫需要。
The status quo, in our view, exposes shareholders to the risk of continued lapses in oversight, a protracted leadership transition, and the suboptimal selection of a successor all of which will likely lead to continued share price underperformance.
我們認爲,現狀使股東面臨持續監督失效、漫長的領導過渡以及繼任者選擇不當的風險,這些都可能導致股價繼續低迷。
Therefore, we intend to support change in the Board's composition at Air Products' 2025 Annual Meeting.
因此,我們打算在艾爾產品公司2025年年度會議上支持董事會組成的變更。
Best Regards,
祝好,
Edwin Jager
Managing Director
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.
埃德溫·雅格
常務董事
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.
Michael O'Mary
Managing Director
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.
邁克爾·奧瑪裏
常務董事
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.
About the D. E. Shaw Group
關於D.E.肖集團
The D. E. Shaw group is a global investment and technology development firm with more than $65 billion in investment capital as of December 1, 2024, and offices in North America, Europe, and Asia. Since our founding in 1988, our firm has earned a reputation for successful investing based on innovation, careful risk management, and the quality and depth of our staff. We have a significant presence in the world's capital markets, investing in a wide range of companies and financial instruments in both developed and developing economies. For more information, please visit .
D.E.肖集團是一家全球投資和技術開發公司,截至2024年12月1日,投資資本超過650億美元,在北美、歐洲和亞洲設有辦事處。自1988年成立以來,我們公司因創新、謹慎的風險管理以及員工的質量和深度而贏得了成功投資的聲譽。我們在全球資本市場上佔有重要地位,投資於已發展和發展經濟體中各種公司的金融工具。欲了解更多信息,請訪問。
This letter reflects the opinions of D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P. ("DESCO LP") on behalf of certain investment funds managed or advised by it that currently beneficially own, or otherwise have an economic interest in, shares of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company" or "APD"). This letter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or convey an offer or solicitation of any type with respect to any securities or other financial products. The views expressed in this letter are expressed as of the date hereof and are based on publicly available information and DESCO LP's analyses. This letter contains statements reflecting DESCO LP's opinions and beliefs with respect to the Company and its business based on DESCO LP's research, analysis, and experience; all such statements are based on DESCO LP's opinion and belief, whether or not those statements are expressly so qualified. DESCO LP acknowledges that the Company may possess information that could lead the Company to disagree with DESCO LP's views and/or analyses. Nothing contained in this letter may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance, or representation as to future events. The investment funds managed or advised by DESCO LP are in the business of trading (i.e., buying and selling) securities, and it is expected that they will from time to time engage in transactions that result in changes to their beneficial and/or economic interest in the Company.
本信函反映了D.E.肖公司("DESCO LP")代表當前有利益擁有或以其他方式對空氣產品及化學品公司("公司"或"APD")的股份有經濟利益的某些投資基金的觀點。本信函僅供參考,並不構成投資建議或傳達任何類型的證券或其他金融產品的要約或招攬。本信函中表達的觀點基於公開可用的信息和DESCO LP的分析,截止本函日期。這封信包含了反映DESCO LP就公司及其業務的觀點和信念的聲明,基於DESCO LP的研究、分析和經驗;所有此類聲明均基於DESCO LP的意見和信念,無論這些聲明是否被明確如此限定。DESCO LP承認公司可能擁有能使其與DESCO LP的觀點和/或分析發生分歧的信息。本信函中的任何內容皆不可視爲對未來事件的保證、承諾、保證或陳述。由DESCO LP管理或建議的投資基金從事證券交易(即買入和賣出),預計他們將不時進行交易,導致其在公司的有利和/或經濟利益發生變化。
Media Contact
Prosek Partners
Brian Schaffer / Kiki Tarkhan
[email protected]
媒體聯繫
Prosek Partners
布賴恩·沙弗 / 基基·塔爾汗
[email protected]
1Air Products' share price has underperformed industrial gas peer companies and the broader market by 6% and 12%, respectively, in just over a month since Air Products filed its preliminary proxy materials recommending against shareholder board nominees.
2See Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines, Amended February 3, 2022.
3Source: Air Products and Chemicals Q3 2024 Earnings Call transcript, August 1, 2024.
4Id.
5Id.
6Id.
1空氣產品的股價在短短一個多月內,分別低於工業氣體同行公司和更加廣泛市場6%和12%,這是因爲空氣產品提交了初步代理材料,反對股東董事提名。
2請參閱空氣產品和化學品公司企業治理準則,修訂於2022年2月3日。
3來源:空氣產品和化學品第三季度2024業績發佈會記錄,2024年8月1日。
4同上。
5Id.
6Id.
SOURCE The D.E. Shaw Group
SOURCE The D.E. Shaw Group