Shareholders in Provident Financial Services (NYSE:PFS) Are in the Red If They Invested Three Years Ago
Shareholders in Provident Financial Services (NYSE:PFS) Are in the Red If They Invested Three Years Ago
As an investor its worth striving to ensure your overall portfolio beats the market average. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) shareholders, since the share price is down 28% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 24%. Even worse, it's down 10.0% in about a month, which isn't fun at all.
作爲投資者,確保您的整體投資組合超越市場平均水平是值得追求的。但選股的風險在於,您可能會購買到表現不佳的公司。不幸的是,這對長期的Provident Financial Services, Inc. (紐交所:PFS) 股東來說一直是個問題,因爲在過去三年中,股價下跌了28%,遠低於市場回報約24%。更糟的是,股價在大約一個月內下跌了10.0%,這可一點也不好玩。
Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns.
由於股東在長期內處於虧損狀態,我們來看看這段時間內的基本面,看看它們是否與回報一致。
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
在他的論文《Graham與Doddsville的超級投資者》中,禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價並不總是理性反映業務價值的原因。通過比較每股收益(每股收益)和股價變化,我們可以感受到投資者對公司的態度如何隨着時間而變化。
During the three years that the share price fell, Provident Financial Services' earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 31% each year. This fall in the EPS is worse than the 10% compound annual share price fall. So, despite the prior disappointment, shareholders must have some confidence the situation will improve, longer term.
在股價下跌的三年裏,Provident Financial Services的每股收益(EPS)每年下降了31%。每股收益的下降比每年10%的複合股價下跌更糟。因此,儘管之前的表現令人失望,股東們必須對長期情況改善抱有一些信心。
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖顯示了EPS隨時間變化的情況(點擊圖像以顯示確切值)。
We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Provident Financial Services' earnings, revenue and cash flow.
我們很高興地報告,CEO的薪酬比大多數同類資本公司的CEO更爲適中。但是,雖然CEO薪酬值得檢查,但真正重要的問題是公司能否在未來實現盈利增長。通過查看Provident Financial Services的盈利、營業收入和現金流的互動圖表深入了解盈利情況。
What About Dividends?
關於分紅派息的問題
When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for Provident Financial Services the TSR over the last 3 years was -15%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要考慮總股東回報(TSR)和股價回報之間的差異。股價回報僅反映股價的變化,而TSR則包括分紅的價值(假設已再投資)以及任何折扣資本籌集或分拆的好處。可以公平地說,TSR爲支付分紅的股票提供了更完整的視圖。我們注意到,對於Provident Financial Services來說,過去三年的TSR爲-15%,這比上述提到的股價回報要好。而且,毫無疑問,分紅支付在很大程度上解釋了這個差異!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Provident Financial Services provided a TSR of 12% over the last twelve months. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 0.1% per year, over five years. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 5 warning signs we've spotted with Provident Financial Services (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
Provident Financial Services在過去12個月內提供了12%的TSR。但是這個回報低於市場。至少,這仍然是一個收益!在過去五年中,TSR每年減少了0.1%。可能這家公司的業務正在穩定。我發現從長遠來看股價作爲業務表現的代理是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的Provident Financial Services的5個警告信號(其中1個可能是嚴重的)。
For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
對於喜歡尋找贏家投資的人來說,這份關於最近有內部人士購買的被低估公司的免費名單,可能正是你所需要的。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在美國交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。