share_log

With 51% Ownership of the Shares, Rithm Capital Corp. (NYSE:RITM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 51% Ownership of the Shares, Rithm Capital Corp. (NYSE:RITM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

持有51%股份的Rithm Capital CORP.(紐交所:RITM)被機構投資者嚴重主導。
Simply Wall St ·  01/04 08:47

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Rithm Capital implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 37% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構在Rithm Capital的 substantial 持有意味着他們對公司的股價有顯著影響。
  • 前25個股東持有37%的業務。
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。

Every investor in Rithm Capital Corp. (NYSE:RITM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每位Rithm Capital CORP.(紐交所:RITM)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確來說約爲51%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構投資者擁有巨大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,機構投資在公司中的佔比被普遍視爲積極特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Rithm Capital.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於Rithm Capital的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:RITM Ownership Breakdown January 4th 2025
紐交所:RITm 所有權分解 2025年1月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rithm Capital?

機構的所有權告訴我們關於Rithm Capital什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

We can see that Rithm Capital does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Rithm Capital, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到Rithm Capital確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這可能表示該公司在投資社區中有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好還是對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,那麼股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看一下Rithm Capital過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:RITM Earnings and Revenue Growth January 4th 2025
紐交所:RITm 2025年1月4日的盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Rithm Capital is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 Rithm Capital並不由對沖基金持有。 目前,先鋒集團是最大股東,持有9.4%的流通股。 爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約5.6%的流通股,第三大股東則持有2.1%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Rithm Capital

Rithm Capital的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Rithm Capital Corp.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$27m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士持有的Rithm Capital CORP.的股份少於1%。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在公司中擁有相當的股份,而不必擁有太多的比例股份。在這種情況下,他們大約擁有價值2700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到一些內部人士的持股總是好事,但檢查一下這些內部人士是否在賣出可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Rithm Capital. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆持有48%的股份,主要由個人投資者構成,他們在Rithm Capital中擁有一定的影響力。雖然這個股份比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這個持有比例可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Rithm Capital (of which 2 are concerning!) you should know about.

我發現了解到底誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有這樣的風險,我們發現Rithm Capital有4個警告信號(其中2個令人擔憂!)您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論