share_log

Wellhope Foods Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603609) Insiders, Who Hold 51% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

Wellhope Foods Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603609) Insiders, Who Hold 51% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

禾豐股份有限公司(上交所代碼:603609)內部人士持有該公司51%的股份,最近的回調讓他們感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  01/04 16:14

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Wellhope Foods' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 禾豐股份的顯著內部持股表明其對公司擴張的內在利益
  • 前六大股東持有50%的股份。
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。

Every investor in Wellhope Foods Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603609) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每個投資者在禾豐股份有限公司(SHSE:603609)都應該意識到最強大的股東集團。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有51%股份的個人內部人士。換句話說,這個集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

As market cap fell to CN¥7.7b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着市場市值在上週降至77億人民幣,內部人士面臨的損失超過了公司的任何其他股東群體。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Wellhope Foods, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討禾豐股份每種類型的所有者,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
SHSE:603609 Ownership Breakdown January 5th 2025
SHSE:603609 股權分佈 2025年1月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wellhope Foods?

機構持股對禾豐股份的意義是什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Wellhope Foods, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

由於機構僅持有禾豐股份的一小部分,因此許多人可能沒有花太多時間考慮這隻股票。但顯然,有一些機構是關注的;並且他們對買入很滿意。如果業務從這裏變得更強,我們可能會看到更多機構急於買入。當多家機構投資者希望買入股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。以下的營業收入軌跡可以作爲未來增長的一個指示,但並沒有任何保證。

big
SHSE:603609 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 5th 2025
上證所:603609 2025年1月5日的盈利和收入增長

Wellhope Foods is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Weidong Jin with 16% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are De geus Group and Yunfeng Ding, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.0%.

禾豐股份並不被對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,最大股東是金偉東,持有16%的流通股。第二和第三大股東是德爾戈斯集團和丁雲峯,他們各自持有9.0%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6大股東佔據了超過一半的股權登記冊,同時有少量小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Wellhope Foods

禾豐股份的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Wellhope Foods Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥7.7b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥3.9b worth of shares in their own names. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

看來,內部人士擁有禾豐股份有限公司超過一半的股票。這給了他們很大的權力。考慮到其市值爲77億人民幣,這意味着內部人士名下擁有價值高達39億人民幣的股票。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在減持股份。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Wellhope Foods. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

以31%的持股比例,公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對禾豐股份有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種持股比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍能對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 14%, of the Wellhope Foods stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看起來私人公司持有禾豐股份14%的股票。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人在公衆公司中的利益是通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是進一步研究的一個領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營業收入和收益的免費圖表來查看。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論