Individual Investors Invested in Venustech Group Inc. (SZSE:002439) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥2.5b Market Cap Decline
Individual Investors Invested in Venustech Group Inc. (SZSE:002439) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥2.5b Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Venustech Group's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- 22% of Venustech Group is held by insiders
- Venustech集團擁有大量的個人投資者所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 51% 的業務由前7名股東持有
- Venustech 集團22%的股份由內部人士持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Venustech Group Inc. (SZSE:002439), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了Venustech Group Inc.(深圳證券交易所:002439),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲38%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
And last week, individual investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 12%.
上週,個人投資者遭受了最大的損失,該股下跌了12%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Venustech Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Venustech集團的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Venustech Group?
關於Venustech集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Venustech Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Venustech Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者持有Venustech集團的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Venustech Group的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Venustech Group. The company's largest shareholder is China Mobile Capital Holding Co., Ltd., with ownership of 23%. With 18% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Jia Wang and Li Yan are the second and third largest shareholders. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders.
對沖基金在Venustech集團的股份不多。公司的最大股東是中國移動資本控股有限公司,持股23%。王嘉和李燕分別佔已發行股份的18%和3.9%,是第二和第三大股東。請注意,第二和第三大股東也分別是首席執行官和董事會成員,這意味着公司的最大股東是內部人士。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前7名股東擁有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上由較小股東所平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Venustech Group
Venustech 集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Venustech Group Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥18b, and insiders have CN¥3.9b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
內部人士似乎擁有Venustech集團公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲180元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值39元人民幣的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司38%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
私募股權公司擁有23%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Venustech Group (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在Venustech集團發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個可能嚴重的警告)。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。