Does Coherent (NYSE:COHR) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Coherent (NYSE:COHR) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Coherent Corp. (NYSE:COHR) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
傳奇基金經理李璐(查理·芒格支持的)曾說過:'最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。'因此,在考慮任何給定股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務可能會沉沒一家公司。我們可以看到,Coherent CORP.(紐交所:COHR)確實在其業務中使用債務。但股東應該擔心其債務使用嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當一個企業無法輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會變得危險,無論是通過自由現金流還是以有吸引力的價格籌集資金。資本主義的一個組成部分是「創造性破壞」的過程,失敗的企業會被他們的銀行家無情清算。然而,一個更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,它不得不以低價籌集新的 股權資本 ,從而永久性稀釋股東。當然,債務在企業中可能是一種重要的工具,特別是在資本密集型企業中。當我們考慮一個公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起。
What Is Coherent's Net Debt?
Coherent的淨債務是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Coherent had debt of US$3.99b at the end of September 2024, a reduction from US$4.29b over a year. However, it does have US$1.04b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$2.95b.
下面的圖像,你可以點擊查看詳細信息,顯示到2024年9月底,Coherent的債務爲39.9億美元,較一年前的42.9億美元減少。然而,它有10.4億美元的現金抵消這部分債務,導致淨債務約爲29.5億美元。
How Strong Is Coherent's Balance Sheet?
科幻的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Coherent had liabilities of US$1.36b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$5.07b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$1.04b and US$819.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.57b.
根據最後報告的資產負債表,科幻的負債爲13.6億美元,12個月內到期的負債爲50.7億美元。另一方面,它有10.4億美元的現金和81970萬美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,它的負債超出了現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和,達到了45.7億美元。
This deficit isn't so bad because Coherent is worth a massive US$16.4b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
這個赤字並不那麼糟糕,因爲科幻的估值爲164億美元,因此如果需要的話,很可能能夠籌集足夠的資金來支持其資產負債表。但我們確實希望關注它的債務是否帶來了過多的風險。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要指標來告知我們債務水平與盈利的關係。第一個是淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,而第二個是其息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用(或其利息覆蓋,簡稱)。這種方法的優點在於我們考慮了債務的絕對數量(通過淨債務與EBITDA比率)和與該債務相關的實際利息費用(通過其利息覆蓋比率)。
While we wouldn't worry about Coherent's net debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.7, we think its super-low interest cover of 0.86 times is a sign of high leverage. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Even worse, Coherent saw its EBIT tank 23% over the last 12 months. If earnings keep going like that over the long term, it has a snowball's chance in hell of paying off that debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Coherent's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
雖然我們不會擔心科幻的淨債務與EBITDA的比率爲3.7,但我們認爲其超低的利息覆蓋率爲0.86倍是高槓杆的跡象。很大程度上,這是由於公司巨大的折舊和攤銷費用,這可以說意味着其EBITDA是一個非常寬鬆的收益度量,其債務可能比最初看起來更具負擔。因此,股東可能要意識到,利息費用似乎最近真正影響了業務。更糟糕的是,科幻的EBIT在過去12個月下降了23%。如果收益長期保持這種趨勢,支付那筆債務的機會幾乎爲零。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的大部分關於債務的知識。但未來的收益,尤其是將判斷科幻未來保持健康資產負債表的能力。如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Coherent produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 60% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,一家公司只能用現金還債,而不是會計利潤。因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是查看該EBIT的比例與實際自由現金流的匹配程度。在過去三年中,Coherent產生了相當可觀的自由現金流,佔其EBIT的60%左右,這與我們的預期相符。這個自由現金流使公司在適當的時候能夠良好地償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both Coherent's interest cover and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Coherent stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Coherent you should know about.
坦白說,Coherent的利息覆蓋率和其EBIT(未)增長的記錄使我們對其債務水平感到相當不安。但是另一方面,它將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力是一個好跡象,使我們更加樂觀。查看資產負債表並考慮所有這些因素,我們確實相信債務使得Coherent的股票有些風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們意識到潛在的陷阱,因此我們可能更傾向於它承載更少的債務。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時應關注的重點。然而,最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表的風險。這些風險可能很難察覺。每家公司都有這些風險,我們發現了Coherent的一條警告信號,你應該知道。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
無論最終結果如何,有時候更容易關注那些根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費獲取一份淨債務爲零的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。