Sinomag Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300835) Last Week's 10% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Sinomag Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300835) Last Week's 10% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Sinomag Technology by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- Insider ownership in Sinomag Technology is 43%
- 個人投資者對龍磁科技的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更多影響力。
- 前25大股東持有公司46%的股份
- 龍磁科技的內部持股爲43%。
A look at the shareholders of Sinomag Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300835) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看龍磁科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300835)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有最大份額的群體是個人投資者,擁有54%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While insiders who own 43% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥3.4b last week,individual investors took the most losses.
儘管持有43%的內部人士在市值上週降至34億人民幣後遭受壓力,但散戶投資者損失最慘重。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sinomag Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於龍磁科技的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sinomag Technology?
機構持有情況對龍磁科技有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Sinomag Technology, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
由於機構僅持有龍磁科技的一小部分股份,許多機構可能並未花費太多時間考慮該股票。但很明顯,有些機構考慮過;而且他們喜歡這隻股票足以選擇買入。所以如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而改善,我們可能會在未來看到更多的機構買家。我們有時會看到,當幾家大型機構同時想要購買某隻股票時,股價會上漲。以下是利潤和營業收入的歷史數據,這可能有助於考慮更多的機構投資者是否會想要這隻股票。當然,還有其他許多因素也要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sinomag Technology. Xiong Yong Hong is currently the company's largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. Xiong Yong Ge is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Yong Zhang holds about 1.9% of the company stock. Xiong Yong Ge, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到對龍磁科技,對沖基金並沒有進行實質性投資。 熊勇鴻目前是公司的最大股東,持有30%的流通股份。 熊勇歌是第二大股東,持有11%的普通股,而楊章持有約1.9%的公司股票。 第二大股東熊勇歌恰好同時擔任首席執行官。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
通過研究我們的持股數據,我們發現前25大股東共同持有的股份少於50%,這意味着沒有任何個人擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構持股情況是評估和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師情緒也能達到同樣的效果。我們的信息顯示該股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,因此可能不爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Sinomag Technology
龍磁科技的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Sinomag Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.5b stake in this CN¥3.4b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有龍磁科技有限公司相當比例的股份。內部人士在這家市值爲34億人民幣的企業中持有15億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 54% stake in Sinomag Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有龍磁科技54%的股份,表明這是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。擁有如此多的股份,散戶投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,例如分紅政策和董事的任命。他們還可以行使投票權,反對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Sinomag Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我覺得研究到底誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如風險 - 龍磁科技有 1 個警告信號 我們認爲你應該注意。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更傾向於查看另一家公司——一家有潛在優越財務狀況的公司——那麼請不要錯過這份由強大財務數據支持的有趣公司免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。