Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301263) Last Week's 6.3% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301263) Last Week's 6.3% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 42% of Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical is held by insiders
- 廣東泰恩康藥品的重大零售投資者持股比例表明,關鍵決策受到大股東的影響。
- 共有11位投資者在公司擁有大多數權益,持股比例爲50%
- 42%的廣東泰恩康藥品由內部人士持有。
A look at the shareholders of Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301263) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看廣東泰恩康藥品有限公司(深交所:301263)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。最大的一部分股權由持有45%股份的零售投資者掌握。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While insiders who own 42% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥6.1b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
由於內部人士持有42%,在市值上週降至61億人民幣後承受了壓力,散戶投資者損失最大。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細分析了廣東太恩康藥品的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical?
機構持股對廣東太恩康藥品有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者在廣東太恩康藥品中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並對其表示認可。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯誤。當多家機構擁有同一只股票時,總會存在『擁擠交易』的風險。當此類交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面查看廣東太恩康藥品的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情常常不止於此。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical. With a 21% stake, CEO Hanjie Zheng is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在廣東太恩康藥品的股份不多。擁有21%股份的首席執行官鄭漢傑是最大的股東。爲了更好地了解,第二大股東持有約16%的流通股份,而第三大股東則擁有3.7%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到前11大股東控制了50%的持有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數持股。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
雖然研究公司機構持股可以爲您的研究增值,但也建議研究分析師的建議,以更深入了解股票的預期表現。該股票的分析師覆蓋較少,但也不是很多。因此,它有機會獲得更多的覆蓋。
Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical
廣東太恩康藥品的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.6b worth of shares in the CN¥6.1b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在廣東太恩康藥品有限公司持有大量股份。內部人士擁有價值26億人民幣的股份,而該公司的市值爲61億人民幣。這可能表明創始人仍然持有很多股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司45%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。儘管這種持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Guangdong Taienkang Pharmaceutical you should know about.
我發現了解誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。然而,要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,而我們發現了關於廣東泰恩康藥品的兩個警告信號,你應該知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。