share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore General Motors Company's (NYSE:GM) Recent US$2.1b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore General Motors Company's (NYSE:GM) Recent US$2.1b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽視通用汽車公司(紐交所:GM)最近21億美金市值的下降,因爲長期利潤仍然保持在正值。
Simply Wall St ·  01/06 21:50

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, General Motors' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 由於機構在股票中持有較大份額,通用汽車的股票價格可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 共有17位投資者在該公司擁有51%的控股權。
  • 內部人士最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls General Motors Company (NYSE:GM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了通用汽車公司(紐交所:GM),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的組成。而持有最大份額的群體是機構,擁有87%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$57b last week. However, the 43% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

機構投資者是受到影響最大的群體,因爲上週公司的市值降至570億美元。然而,43%的年回報率可能幫助減輕了他們的損失。然而,他們應該對未來的進一步虧損保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of General Motors, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解通用汽車每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:GM Ownership Breakdown January 6th 2025
紐交所:通用汽車的所有權分佈 2025年1月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About General Motors?

機構持股告訴我們關於通用汽車什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that General Motors does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at General Motors' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到通用汽車確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證是最好的保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看通用汽車的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:GM Earnings and Revenue Growth January 6th 2025
紐交所:通用汽車的盈利和營業收入增長 2025年1月6日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in General Motors. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.5% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 6.3% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對沖基金在通用汽車的股份並不多。 貝萊德公司目前是該公司最大的股東,持有9.5%的流通股。 先鋒集團公司是第二大股東,持有8.6%的普通股,而資本研究與管理公司持有約6.3%的公司股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更多調查,我們發現前17大股東在公司中的合計持股爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有顯著控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of General Motors

通用汽車的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of General Motors Company in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$92m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己名義持有的通用汽車公司的股份低於1%。 這是一家非常大型的公司,因此內部人士持有公司較大比例的股份將是令人驚訝的。雖然他們的持有量低於1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同持有價值9200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over General Motors. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆持有13%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,因此在通用汽車上有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能夠完全掌控局面,但它確實可以對公司如何運行產生實質性的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for General Motors you should be aware of, and 2 of them are potentially serious.

我覺得確切了解誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞見,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 舉個例子:我們發現了 3 個警告信號關於通用汽車 你需要注意,其中 2 個可能是嚴重的。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論