share_log

CEO Man Li Wong, Man Wah Holdings Limited's (HKG:1999) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 5.3% After Recent Drop

CEO Man Li Wong, Man Wah Holdings Limited's (HKG:1999) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 5.3% After Recent Drop

CEO王文利,萬華控股有限公司(HKG:1999)的最大股東,在最近的下跌後,其持股價值下降了5.3%。
Simply Wall St ·  01/07 07:26

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Man Wah Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • Man Li Wong owns 62% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Man Wah Holdings is 16%
  • 滿華控股的顯著內部持股表明對公司擴展的固有利益
  • 黃文莉持有公司62%的股份
  • 滿華控股的機構持股爲16%

If you want to know who really controls Man Wah Holdings Limited (HKG:1999), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制滿華控股有限公司(HKG:1999),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到,個人內部人士在公司中持有大部分股份,達63%的持股比例。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該組將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下跌則損失最多)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 5.3%.

上週,內部人士遭受了最大的損失,股票下跌了5.3%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Man Wah Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解一下萬華控股的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SEHK:1999 Ownership Breakdown January 6th 2025
SEHK:1999 所有權分佈 2025年1月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Man Wah Holdings?

機構持股對萬華控股意味着什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Man Wah Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Man Wah Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在萬華控股中持有相當的股份。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖在同一時間出售同一只股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查萬華控股過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SEHK:1999 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 6th 2025
港交所:1999 盈利與營收增長 2025年1月6日

Man Wah Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Man Li Wong is the largest shareholder with 62% of shares outstanding. This implies that they possess majority interests and have significant control over the company. Investors usually consider it a good sign when the company leadership has such a significant stake, as this is widely perceived to increase the chance that the management will act in the best interests of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.1% and 1.6% of the stock.

穩華控股並不被對沖基金所擁有。公司的首席執行官黃敏莉是最大的股東,持有62%的流通股。這意味着他們擁有多數權益,並對公司具有顯著控制權。投資者通常認爲,當公司領導層擁有如此顯著的股份時,意味着公司管理層更可能爲公司的最佳利益行動,這被廣泛看作是一個好兆頭。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約2.1%和1.6%的股票。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Man Wah Holdings

穩華控股的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Man Wah Holdings Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$17b, that means insiders have a whopping HK$11b worth of shares in their own names. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,內部人擁有滿華控股有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。考慮到它的市值爲170億港元,這意味着內部人自己名下的股票價值高達110億港元。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。你可能想知道他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Man Wah Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆一般由個人投資者組成,他們在滿華控股中持有22%的股份。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Man Wah Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Man Wah Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解滿華控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子,投資風險的無處不在。我們已經發現滿華控股有一個警告信號,理解這些信號應該是你投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論