CEO Weiming Xie, G.Tech Technology Ltd.'s (SZSE:301503) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 14% After Recent Drop
CEO Weiming Xie, G.Tech Technology Ltd.'s (SZSE:301503) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 14% After Recent Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant insider control over G.Tech Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 59% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 對G.Tech科技的顯著內部控制意味着對公司成長的既得利益
- 共有2名投資者在公司中擁有59%的控股權。
- 公司的過往表現以及所有權數據有助於強烈判斷業務的前景
A look at the shareholders of G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
通過查看G.Tech科技有限公司(深交所代碼:301503)的股東,我們可以看出哪個團體最有影響力。我們可以看到,個人內部人士在公司中擁有59%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該團體將獲益最多(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
And following last week's 14% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上週股價下跌14%之後,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about G.Tech Technology.
讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於G.Tech科技的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About G.Tech Technology?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於G.Tech科技什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
G.Tech Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see G.Tech Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
G.Tech科技已經在股東名冊上擁有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們對其有好的看法。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在着它們在一場「擁擠交易」中風險的可能性。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會競爭着快速賣出股票。在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到G.Tech科技的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的內容。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in G.Tech Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Weiming Xie with 30% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 29% and 5.6% of the stock.
我們注意到對G.Tech科技的對沖基金投資並不顯著。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是首席執行官謝衛明,持有30%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約29%和5.6%的股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩大股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們在影響公司決策方面有相當大的權力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒同樣重要,以了解市場的動向。我們的信息表明,這隻股票並沒有任何分析師覆蓋,因此可能不爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of G.Tech Technology
G.Tech科技的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of G.Tech Technology Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥2.5b, that means they have CN¥1.5b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有G.Tech科技有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。考慮到它的市值爲CN¥25億,這意味着他們擁有價值CN¥15億的股份。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over G.Tech Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有20%股份的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在G.Tech科技中擁有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the G.Tech Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎私營公司擁有G.Tech科技股票的15%。 這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人士,參與了這些私營公司之一,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand G.Tech Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for G.Tech Technology (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.
思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解G.Tech科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 比如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們發現了G.Tech科技的2個警告信號(其中1個是重要的!),您應該知道。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的股票購買選擇。因此,請查看這個有趣公司的免費列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。