Read This Before Judging Chart Industries, Inc.'s (NYSE:GTLS) ROE
Read This Before Judging Chart Industries, Inc.'s (NYSE:GTLS) ROE
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE:GTLS), by way of a worked example.
我們可以做出的最好投資之一就是投資於自己的知識和技能。考慮到這一點,本文將探討我們如何利用股本回報率(ROE)來更好地理解一個業務。我們將以查特工業公司(紐交所:GTLS)爲例,通過一個案例進行分析。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
淨資產收益率(ROE)是一項測試,旨在評估公司如何有效地增長其價值並管理投資者資金。換句話說,它是一個盈利能力比率,衡量由公司股東提供的資本的回報率。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股東權益回報率?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
ROE可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 凈利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Chart Industries is:
因此,根據上述公式,查特工業的ROE爲:
6.5% = US$204m ÷ US$3.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
6.5% = US$20400萬 ÷ US$31億(基於截至2024年9月的過去12個月)。
The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.07 in profit.
「回報」是企業在過去一年內賺取的收入。這意味着每價值1美元的股東權益,公司產生了0.07美元的利潤。
Does Chart Industries Have A Good ROE?
查特工業的ROE好嗎?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Chart Industries has a lower ROE than the average (15%) in the Machinery industry classification.
通過將公司的ROE與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其好壞。然而,這種方法只是作爲粗略的檢查,因爲在同一行業分類下公司之間的差異確實相當大。如果您查看下圖,您會發現查特工業的ROE低於機械行業分類的平均水平(15%)。

That certainly isn't ideal. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved.
這確實不是理想的情況。雖然我們認爲,較低的ROE仍可能意味着公司有機會通過利用槓桿來改善其回報,前提是其現有的債務水平較低。我們喜歡避免高債務水平和低ROE的公司組合,因爲涉及到的風險。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金用於投資業務,以提高盈利能力。這些資金可以來自留存收益、發行新股票(股權)或債務。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映這筆資金用於業務投資。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務會提高回報,但不會影響總股本。這將使ROE看起來比沒有使用債務時更好。
Combining Chart Industries' Debt And Its 6.5% Return On Equity
綜合查特工業的債務和其6.5%的淨資產收益率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Chart Industries, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.24. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
值得注意的是查特工業的高債務使用,這導致其債務與股本比率爲1.24。由於淨資產收益率相對較低,並且債務使用顯著,目前很難對這一業務感到興奮。債務增加了風險,並減少了公司未來的選擇,因此通常希望看到使用債務獲得一些良好的回報。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股東權益回報率對於比較不同業務的質量是很有用的。能夠在沒有過多債務的情況下實現高股東權益回報率的公司通常質量較好。如果兩家公司債務與股本比率大致相同,而其中一家ROE更高,我通常會偏好ROE更高的那家。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但是,當一家企業質量高時,市場往往會將其價格推高,反映出這一點。利潤增長率與股票價格中反映的預期相比,尤其重要。因此,我認爲查看這份有關分析師預測的免費報告可能值得。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,你可能會在其他地方找到一個了不起的投資機會。所以查看一下這個有趣公司的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。