share_log

Here's Why Amcor (NYSE:AMCR) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Here's Why Amcor (NYSE:AMCR) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

這就是爲什麼Amcor(紐交所:AMCR)面臨重大債務負擔的原因
Simply Wall St ·  01/07 07:17

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Amcor plc (NYSE:AMCR) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

受巴菲特的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李魯毫不隱晦地表示,"最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你是否會遭受資本的永久損失。" 當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總喜歡關注其債務使用情況,因爲債務過重可能導致破產。我們可以看到Amcor plc(紐交所:AMCR)在其業務中確實使用了債務。不過,這種債務對股東來說是個問題嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時會變得危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆還清時才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過融資還是憑藉自身的現金流。如果情況非常糟糕,貸款人可能會控制這家企業。然而,更常見(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,僅僅是爲了修復其資產負債表。然而,通過替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資於增長的企業的極好工具。考慮公司的債務水平時,第一步是將現金和債務一起考慮。

How Much Debt Does Amcor Carry?

Amcor揹負了多少債務?

As you can see below, Amcor had US$7.37b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$432.0m, its net debt is less, at about US$6.94b.

正如您在下方看到的,截至2024年9月,Amcor的債務爲73.7億美金,與去年大致相同。您可以點擊圖表以獲取更多詳細信息。不過,由於其現金儲備爲43200萬美金,其淨債務減少至約69.4億美金。

big
NYSE:AMCR Debt to Equity History January 7th 2025
紐交所:AMCR的債務與股東權益歷史 2025年1月7日

How Healthy Is Amcor's Balance Sheet?

Amcor的資產負債表有多健康?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Amcor had liabilities of US$4.07b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$8.85b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$432.0m and US$1.97b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$10.5b.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看到,Amcor有40.7億美元的負債將在一年內到期,以及88.5億美元的負債將在一年後到期。另一方面,它有43200萬美元的現金和19.7億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債比現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和多出105億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage even relative to its gargantuan market capitalization of US$13.4b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

這筆槓桿資金即使相對於其134億美元的龐大市值來說也是一座大山。這表明,如果公司需要迅速鞏固其資產負債表,股東將遭受嚴重稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們通過查看公司的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比例來衡量公司相對於其收益能力的債務負擔,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息支出的能力(利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們在考慮收益時同時考慮了折舊與攤銷費用及不考慮這些費用的情況。

Amcor has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.6 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 4.1 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Notably, Amcor's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year, which isn't ideal given the debt load. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Amcor can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Amcor的債務與EBITDA的比率爲3.6,其EBIT能夠覆蓋其利息支出4.1倍。綜合來看,這意味着儘管我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它能夠處理當前的槓桿情況。值得注意的是,Amcor的EBIT在過去一年中相當平穩,考慮到債務負擔,這並不理想。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到最多關於債務的知識。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定Amcor能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看此免費報告,了解分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Amcor recorded free cash flow worth 58% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,雖然稅務局可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受現金。因此,檢查一下EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的,這很重要。在最近的三年中,Amcor記錄的自由現金流佔其EBIT的58%,考慮到自由現金流不包括利息和稅,這大致是正常的。這筆冷硬的現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

While Amcor's level of total liabilities makes us cautious about it, its track record of managing its debt, based on its EBITDA, is no better. But its not so bad at converting EBIT to free cash flow. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Amcor's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Amcor has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

雖然Amcor的總負債水平讓我們對此感到謹慎,但基於其EBITDA的債務管理記錄也並沒有更好。但它在將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流方面表現尚可。綜合上述因素,我們認爲Amcor的債務對業務構成了一定風險。因此,儘管這種槓桿確實提高了股本收益率,但我們並不希望其從這裏繼續增加。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的重點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表的風險。例如,Amcor有2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論