Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as General Mills, Inc.'s (NYSE:GIS) Recent US$1.6b Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as General Mills, Inc.'s (NYSE:GIS) Recent US$1.6b Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, General Mills' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構對股票的持有比例較大,通用磨坊的股票價格可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 51%的業務由前20名股東持有
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
To get a sense of who is truly in control of General Mills, Inc. (NYSE:GIS), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 79% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着通用磨坊公司(紐交所:GIS),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的群體是機構,擁有79%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的收益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$1.6b. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 2.9% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell General Mills, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,上週機構投資者承受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了16億美元。 毋庸置疑,最近的損失進一步增加了股東1年的損失達2.9%,這對這一類股東來說可能不太好。 通常被稱爲「市場推動者」,機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有顯著的權力。 因此,如果下行趨勢持續,機構可能面臨賣出通用磨坊的壓力,這可能對個人投資者產生負面影響。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about General Mills.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於通用磨坊的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About General Mills?
機構持股對通用磨坊有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
General Mills already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see General Mills' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
通用磨坊已經有機構在其股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這在專業投資者之間表明了一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時候也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。這個風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到通用磨坊的歷史營業收入和歷史數據,但請記住,故事總是更復雜。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in General Mills. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.1% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在通用磨坊的股份不多。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約10%和6.1%的股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地觀察我們的股權數據,前20大股東的合計持股爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of General Mills
通用磨坊的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of General Mills, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$118m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有通用磨坊公司不到1%的股份。 由於這是一個大公司,我們只會期望內部人士持有一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值11800萬美元的股份。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in General Mills. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,通常是個別投資者,持有通用磨坊20%的股份。 儘管這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand General Mills better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for General Mills that you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解通用磨坊,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們已經識別出通用磨坊的一個警示信號,你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。