Here's Why MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Here's Why MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies MYR Group Inc. (NASDAQ:MYRG) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,與其擔心股票價格波動,"永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險……也是我認識的每一個實際投資者所擔心的。" 當我們考慮一家公司有多風險時,我們總是喜歡查看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過重可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,MYR Group Inc. (納斯達克:MYRG) 也使用了債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使公司變得風險重重。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務在企業面臨償還困難時會幫助企業,無論是通過新的資本還是通過自由現金流。最終,如果公司無法履行其法律還債義務,股東可能會一無所獲。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東,僅僅是爲了控制債務。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司能合理地管理其債務,並從中獲益。當我們檢查債務水平時,首先會將現金和債務水平一起考慮。
What Is MYR Group's Net Debt?
MYR Group的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, MYR Group had US$93.2m of debt, up from US$62.3m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$7.57m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$85.6m.
正如你在下面看到的,截至2024年9月底,MYR Group的債務爲9320萬美元,較一年前的6230萬美元有所增加。點擊圖片查看更多詳細信息。然而,它的現金爲757萬美元,這抵消了部分債務,淨債務約爲8560萬美元。
A Look At MYR Group's Liabilities
MYR Group負債情況一覽
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that MYR Group had liabilities of US$762.4m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$242.1m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$7.57m and US$998.5m worth of receivables due within a year. So its total liabilities are just about perfectly matched by its shorter-term, liquid assets.
從最新的資產負債表中,我們可以看到MYR Group在一年內到期的負債爲76,240萬美元,而一年後到期的負債爲24,210萬美元。另一方面,它擁有757萬美元的現金和99,850萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,其總負債與其短期流動資產幾乎完全匹配。
This state of affairs indicates that MYR Group's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So while it's hard to imagine that the US$2.41b company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet.
這種情況表明MYR Group的資產負債表相當穩健,因爲其總負債幾乎等於其流動資產。因此,雖然很難想象這家24.1億美金的公司在現金上苦苦掙扎,但我們仍然認爲有必要監測其資產負債表。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過看淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何輕鬆地覆蓋利息費用(利息覆蓋)來衡量一家公司相對於其獲利能力的債務負擔。這樣,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量,也考慮了其支付的利率。
MYR Group has net debt of just 0.71 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 9.7 times the interest expense over the last year. It is just as well that MYR Group's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 56% over the last year. Falling earnings (if the trend continues) could eventually make even modest debt quite risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if MYR Group can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
MYR Group的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.71倍,表明它絕不是一個冒失的借款者。這一觀點得到了良好的利息覆蓋率的支持,過去一年EBIT是利息支出的9.7倍。MYR Group的負擔並不太重,因爲其EBIT在過去一年下降了56%。如果這種趨勢持續下降,甚至適度的債務也可能變得相當危險。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定MYR Group能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告非常有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, MYR Group's free cash flow amounted to 31% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,儘管稅務部門可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款方只接受冷硬的現金。因此,檢查EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持是值得的。在過去三年中,MYR Group的自由現金流佔EBIT的31%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不是很好。
Our View
我們的觀點
Based on what we've seen MYR Group is not finding it easy, given its EBIT growth rate, but the other factors we considered give us cause to be optimistic. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. Looking at all this data makes us feel a little cautious about MYR Group's debt levels. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - MYR Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
根據我們所看到的,MYR Group並不輕鬆,考慮到其EBIt增長率,但我們考慮的其他因素讓我們有理由保持樂觀。毫無疑問,其用EBIt來覆蓋利息支出的能力相當出色。查看所有這些數據讓我們對MYR Group的債務水平感到有些謹慎。雖然我們認爲債務可以提高股東權益的回報,但我們建議股東密切關注其債務水平,以免增加。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時的重點。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表上——遠非如此。例如,MYR Group有一個我們認爲您應該注意的警告信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
最終,通常更好的是關注沒有淨負債的公司。你可以訪問我們特別列出這些公司的名單(所有公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。