IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) Is Finding It Tricky To Allocate Its Capital
IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) Is Finding It Tricky To Allocate Its Capital
If you're looking at a mature business that's past the growth phase, what are some of the underlying trends that pop up? When we see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) in conjunction with a declining base of capital employed, that's often how a mature business shows signs of aging. This indicates to us that the business is not only shrinking the size of its net assets, but its returns are falling as well. Having said that, after a brief look, IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) we aren't filled with optimism, but let's investigate further.
如果你在關注一個已經過了增長階段的成熟業務,那麼有哪些潛在的趨勢會浮現出來呢?當我們看到資本使用回報率(ROCE)下降,同時資本使用基數也在下降時,這通常就是成熟業務老化的跡象。這表明這個業務不僅在縮減淨資產的規模,它的收益也在下降。話雖如此,經過短暫的觀察,IPG光電(納斯達克:IPGP)未能讓我們感到樂觀,但我們再深入調查一下。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
什麼是資本回報率(ROCE)?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on IPG Photonics is:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人來說,它衡量的是公司從其業務中使用的資本所能產生的稅前利潤。IPG光電的這個計算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.014 = US$30m ÷ (US$2.4b - US$194m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.014 = 3000萬美元 ÷ (24億 - 194百萬)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, IPG Photonics has an ROCE of 1.4%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Electronic industry average of 10%.
因此,IPG光電的ROCE爲1.4%。最終,這是一個較低的回報,低於電子行業平均水平的10%。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for IPG Photonics compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for IPG Photonics .
上面您可以看到IPG光電當前的資本回報率與其之前的資本回報率相比,但從過去的信息中只能了解這麼多。如果您感興趣,可以查看我們提供的IPG光電的分析師預測報告。
What Does the ROCE Trend For IPG Photonics Tell Us?
IPG光電的資本回報率趨勢告訴我們什麼?
There is reason to be cautious about IPG Photonics, given the returns are trending downwards. About five years ago, returns on capital were 13%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect IPG Photonics to turn into a multi-bagger.
考慮到資本回報率正在下降,我們應該對IPG光電保持謹慎。大約五年前,資本回報率爲13%,然而如上所述,目前大大低於這個水平。更重要的是,值得注意的是,業務中所使用的資本量保持相對穩定。表現出這些特徵的公司通常不會縮水,但可能已趨於成熟,並且面臨來自競爭的利潤壓力。如果這些趨勢繼續下去,我們不會期望IPG光電會變成一個暴利股。
The Bottom Line On IPG Photonics' ROCE
關於IPG光電的資本回報率的結論
In summary, it's unfortunate that IPG Photonics is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 46% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
總之,IPG光電從同樣的資本中創造的回報下降,這是不幸的。因此,股票在過去五年中下跌了46%也就不足爲奇了,這看起來像是投資者正在意識到這些變化。在這種情況下,除非潛在趨勢恢復到更積極的軌道,否則我們會考慮尋找其他投資選擇。
If you're still interested in IPG Photonics it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for IPGP to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.
如果您仍然對IPG光電感興趣,可以查看我們的免費內在價值估算,以了解它在其他方面是否以吸引人的價格交易。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
對於喜歡投資於穩健公司的投資者,可以查看這個免費的穩健資產負債表和高股本回報率公司的列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。