share_log

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

地區金融公司(紐交所:RF)擁有81%的股份,機構投資者對此的影響力很大。
Simply Wall St ·  01/09 08:16

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Regions Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着地區金融的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
  • 前15大股東持有公司50%的股份
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。

Every investor in Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

地區金融公司(紐交所:RF)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 機構持有81%的股份,擁有公司的最大份額。 換句話說,該群體最有可能從對公司的投資中獲利(或虧損最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Regions Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解地區金融的每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:RF Ownership Breakdown January 9th 2025
紐交所:RF 所有權分解 2025年1月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Regions Financial?

機構所有權告訴我們關於地區金融什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

Regions Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Regions Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

地區金融已經在股東名冊上有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看地區金融過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)。當然,記得還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:RF Earnings and Revenue Growth January 9th 2025
紐約證券交易所:RF收益和營業收入增長 2025年1月9日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Regions Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.1% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以強有力地影響董事會決策。對地區金融的對沖基金股份不多。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有12%的流通股份。貝萊德是第二大股東,擁有9.1%的普通股,而道富全球顧問公司持有大約6.1%的公司股票。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的股權數據的仔細觀察表明,前15大股東的合計持股比例爲50%,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構的持股是一種很好的方式,可以評估和篩選股票的預期表現。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,您可以很容易地查找預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Regions Financial

地區金融的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Regions Financial Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$72m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士在地區金融公司的個人持股佔比低於1%。由於這是一家大型公司,我們僅預期內部人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值7200萬美元的股份。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Regions Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆持有18%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對地區金融公司有一定的影響力。儘管這個持股比例可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現深入分析公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這一詳細的歷史營業收入、營業收入和現金流的圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論