Altria Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:MO) Institutional Investors Lost 3.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Altria Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:MO) Institutional Investors Lost 3.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Altria Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構在奧馳亞集團的巨額持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響。
- 前25名股東持有該業務的42%。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
Every investor in Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE:MO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 61% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位奧馳亞集團的投資者(紐交所:MO)都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有最大份額的群體是擁有61%股份的機構。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(如果出現下跌,則損失最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$2.8b last week. However, the 35% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下降28億美元后遭受了最大的損失。然而,給股東的35%的一年回報可能減輕了損失。我們假設他們未來會關注潛在的弱點。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Altria Group.
在下面的圖表中,我們 zoom in 在奧馳亞集團不同的所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Altria Group?
機構所有權告訴我們有關奧馳亞集團的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that Altria Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Altria Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到奧馳亞集團確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這些股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構在同一時間改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股票價格迅速下跌。因此,值得查看奧馳亞集團的收益歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Altria Group. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares outstanding. With 8.2% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們共同可以強烈影響董事會的決策。對奧馳亞集團來說,對沖基金持有的股份不多。先鋒集團目前是公司最大的股東,持有9.2%的流通股份。貝萊德和資本研究與管理公司分別持有8.2%和4.5%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Altria Group
奧馳亞集團股權內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Altria Group, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$63m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,奧馳亞集團公司內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此內部人士擁有大比例股份的情況會讓人感到驚訝。儘管他們的持股不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值6300萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。 可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Altria Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆擁有39%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對奧馳亞集團有一定的影響力。 雖然這個群體不一定能決定公司的重大事務,但他們肯定能對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Altria Group has 2 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
我發現研究究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,承擔風險 - 奧馳亞集團有2個警示信號(和1個讓我們感到不安的信號),我們認爲你應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。