Key Insights
- Significant control over China Nuclear Engineering by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (China National Nuclear Corporation)
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
Every investor in China Nuclear Engineering Corporation Limited (SHSE:601611) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 6.2%.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Nuclear Engineering.
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240205/0-ed3c30ae5978f414a8b82843152108ee-0-32e942e55b3f0a0b62f16e6e63ad3fda.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Nuclear Engineering?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
We can see that China Nuclear Engineering does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Nuclear Engineering's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240205/0-ed3c30ae5978f414a8b82843152108ee-1-dcf3e8c8734aa0d26a93c37e02fbb8a8.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Nuclear Engineering. Our data shows that China National Nuclear Corporation is the largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Huihua Fund Management Co., Ltd. holds about 3.9% of the company stock.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
Insider Ownership Of China Nuclear Engineering
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of China Nuclear Engineering Corporation Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥9.9m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over China Nuclear Engineering. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Private Company Ownership
It seems that Private Companies own 57%, of the China Nuclear Engineering stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
Public Company Ownership
We can see that public companies hold 10% of the China Nuclear Engineering shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
Next Steps:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand China Nuclear Engineering better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for China Nuclear Engineering (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.