David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Fluor Corporation (NYSE:FLR) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
What Is Fluor's Debt?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Fluor had debt of US$1.14b, up from US$996.0m in one year. However, it does have US$2.71b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of US$1.57b.
![1724755114626](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240827/42936040-0-08ff95f9a2e15ae83b7da0d54a850a03.webp/bigjpg)
A Look At Fluor's Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that Fluor had liabilities of US$2.84b due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.73b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$2.71b and US$2.00b worth of receivables due within a year. So it can boast US$137.0m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
This state of affairs indicates that Fluor's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So while it's hard to imagine that the US$8.50b company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. Simply put, the fact that Fluor has more cash than debt is arguably a good indication that it can manage its debt safely.
Even more impressive was the fact that Fluor grew its EBIT by 405% over twelve months. If maintained that growth will make the debt even more manageable in the years ahead. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Fluor can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. While Fluor has net cash on its balance sheet, it's still worth taking a look at its ability to convert earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, to help us understand how quickly it is building (or eroding) that cash balance. Looking at the most recent three years, Fluor recorded free cash flow of 39% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
Summing Up
While we empathize with investors who find debt concerning, you should keep in mind that Fluor has net cash of US$1.57b, as well as more liquid assets than liabilities. And we liked the look of last year's 405% year-on-year EBIT growth. So we don't think Fluor's use of debt is risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Fluor is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.