Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. So after we looked into Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC), the trends above didn't look too great.
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Studio City International Holdings, this is the formula:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.013 = US$37m ÷ (US$3.1b - US$161m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
Therefore, Studio City International Holdings has an ROCE of 1.3%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Hospitality industry average of 10%.
![1725018230325](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240830/43124745-0-c4259900cc2bebb33077cfbe1637804b.webp/bigjpg)
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you want to delve into the historical earnings , check out these free graphs detailing revenue and cash flow performance of Studio City International Holdings.
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
There is reason to be cautious about Studio City International Holdings, given the returns are trending downwards. About five years ago, returns on capital were 5.6%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. Meanwhile, capital employed in the business has stayed roughly the flat over the period. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Studio City International Holdings becoming one if things continue as they have.
The Key Takeaway
All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. This could explain why the stock has sunk a total of 71% in the last five years. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
One more thing: We've identified 3 warning signs with Studio City International Holdings (at least 2 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them would certainly be useful.
While Studio City International Holdings may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.