share_log

An Intrinsic Calculation For Nanofilm Technologies International Limited (SGX:MZH) Suggests It's 26% Undervalued

An Intrinsic Calculation For Nanofilm Technologies International Limited (SGX:MZH) Suggests It's 26% Undervalued

纳菲尔姆科技国际有限公司(SGX: MZH)的内在计算表明其估值被低估了26%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/05/03 22:14

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The projected fair value for Nanofilm Technologies International is S$2.14 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity
  • Nanofilm Technologies International is estimated to be 26% undervalued based on current share price of S$1.59
  • The S$1.34 analyst price target for MZH is 37% less than our estimate of fair value
  • 根据两阶段自由现金流转股权,Nanofilm Technologies International的预计公允价值为2.14新元
  • 根据目前1.59新元的股价,Nanofilm Technologies International的估值估计被低估了26%
  • 分析师对MZH的1.34新元目标股价比我们对公允价值的估计低37%

In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of Nanofilm Technologies International Limited (SGX:MZH) by estimating the company's future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. This will be done using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Don't get put off by the jargon, the math behind it is actually quite straightforward.

在本文中,我们将通过估算公司未来的现金流并将其折现为现值来估算Nanofilm Technologies International Limited(SGX: MZH)的内在价值。这将使用贴现现金流 (DCF) 模型来完成。不要被行话拖延了,它背后的数学其实很简单。

We would caution that there are many ways of valuing a company and, like the DCF, each technique has advantages and disadvantages in certain scenarios. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model.

我们要提醒的是,对公司进行估值的方法有很多,就像DCF一样,每种技术在某些情况下都有优点和缺点。任何有兴趣进一步了解内在价值的人都应该读一读 Simply Wall St 分析模型。

See our latest analysis for Nanofilm Technologies International

查看我们对纳诺菲尔姆科技国际的最新分析

The Model

该模型

We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second 'steady growth' period. In the first stage we need to estimate the cash flows to the business over the next ten years. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.

我们将使用两阶段的DCF模型,顾名思义,该模型考虑了两个增长阶段。第一阶段通常是较高的增长期,在第二个 “稳步增长” 时期逐渐趋于平稳,最终值是第二个 “稳定增长” 时期。在第一阶段,我们需要估算未来十年的业务现金流。在可能的情况下,我们会使用分析师的估计值,但是当这些估计值不可用时,我们会从最新的估计值或报告的价值中推断出之前的自由现金流(FCF)。我们假设自由现金流萎缩的公司将减缓其萎缩速度,而自由现金流不断增长的公司在此期间的增长率将放缓。我们这样做是为了反映早期增长的放缓幅度往往比后来的几年更大。

Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:

通常,我们假设今天的一美元比未来一美元更有价值,因此我们需要对这些未来现金流的总和进行折价才能得出现值估计:

10-year free cash flow (FCF) forecast

10 年自由现金流 (FCF) 预测

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Levered FCF (SGD, Millions) S$16.4m S$23.1m S$39.4m S$52.9m S$66.0m S$77.7m S$87.9m S$96.4m S$103.5m S$109.5m
Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x2 Analyst x2 Analyst x2 Est @ 34.33% Est @ 24.62% Est @ 17.82% Est @ 13.06% Est @ 9.73% Est @ 7.40% Est @ 5.77%
Present Value (SGD, Millions) Discounted @ 7.5% S$15.3 S$19.9 S$31.7 S$39.6 S$45.9 S$50.3 S$52.9 S$54.0 S$53.9 S$53.0
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Levered FCF(新加坡元,百万) 1640 万新元 2310 万新元 3,940 万新元 5290 万新元 6600 万新元 7,770 万新元 8790 万新元 9640 万新元 1.035 亿新元 1.095 亿新元
增长率估算来源 分析师 x2 分析师 x2 分析师 x2 Est @ 34.33% 美国东部标准时间 @ 24.62% Est @ 17.82% 美国东部标准时间 @ 13.06% 美国东部标准时间 @ 9.73% 美国东部标准时间 @ 7.40% Est @ 5.77%
现值(新加坡元,百万元)折扣价 @ 7.5% 15.3 新元 19.9 新元 31.7 S.7 39.6 新元 S45.9 50.3 美元 52.9 新元 54.0 新元 53.9 S53.9 53.0 美元

("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = S$416m

(“Est” = Simply Wall St估计的FCF增长率)
10年期现金流(PVCF)的现值 = 4.16 亿新元

The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 2.0%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 7.5%.

第二阶段也称为终端价值,这是第一阶段之后的企业现金流。戈登增长公式用于计算终端价值,其未来年增长率等于10年期政府债券收益率2.0%的5年平均水平。我们将终端现金流折现为今天的价值,权益成本为7.5%。

Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2032 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = S$110m× (1 + 2.0%) ÷ (7.5%– 2.0%) = S$2.0b

终端价值 (TV)= FCF2032 × (1 + g) ÷ (r — g) = 1.1亿新元× (1 + 2.0%) ÷ (7.5% — 2.0%) = 20亿新元

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= S$2.0b÷ ( 1 + 7.5%)10= S$971m

终端价值的现值 (PVTV)= 电视/ (1 + r)10= 2.0bb÷ (1 + 7.5%)10= 9.71 亿新元

The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is S$1.4b. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of S$1.6, the company appears a touch undervalued at a 26% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Valuations are imprecise instruments though, rather like a telescope - move a few degrees and end up in a different galaxy. Do keep this in mind.

因此,总价值或权益价值是未来现金流现值的总和,在本例中为14亿新元。最后一步是将股票价值除以已发行股票的数量。与目前的1.6新元股价相比,该公司的估值似乎略有低估,比目前的股价折扣了26%。但是,估值是不精确的工具,就像望远镜一样——移动几度然后进入另一个星系。请记住这一点。

dcf
SGX:MZH Discounted Cash Flow May 4th 2023
新加坡交易所:MZH 2023 年 5 月 4 日贴现现金流

The Assumptions

假设

We would point out that the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate and of course the actual cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Nanofilm Technologies International as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 7.5%, which is based on a levered beta of 0.937. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

我们要指出,贴现现金流的最重要投入是贴现率,当然还有实际现金流。如果你不同意这些结果,那就自己去计算一下,试试假设。DCF也没有考虑一个行业可能的周期性,也没有考虑公司未来的资本需求,因此它没有全面描述公司的潜在表现。鉴于我们将Nanofilm Technologies International视为潜在股东,因此使用股权成本作为贴现率,而不是构成债务的资本成本(或加权平均资本成本,WACC)。在此计算中,我们使用了 7.5%,这是基于 0.937 的杠杆测试值。与整个市场相比,Beta是衡量股票波动率的指标。我们的测试值来自全球可比公司的行业平均测试值,施加的限制在0.8到2.0之间,对于稳定的业务而言,这是一个合理的范围。

SWOT Analysis for Nanofilm Technologies International

国际纳米薄膜技术的 SWOT 分析

Strength
力量
  • Debt is not viewed as a risk.
  • 债务不被视为风险。
  • Balance sheet summary for MZH.
  • MZH 的资产负债表摘要。
Weakness
弱点
  • Earnings declined over the past year.
  • 在过去的一年中,收益有所下降。
  • Dividend is low compared to the top 25% of dividend payers in the Chemicals market.
  • 与化工市场前25%的股息支付者相比,股息很低。
Opportunity
机会
  • Annual earnings are forecast to grow faster than the Singaporean market.
  • 预计年收入的增长速度将快于新加坡市场。
  • Trading below our estimate of fair value by more than 20%.
  • 交易价格比我们估计的公允价值低20%以上。
Threat
威胁
  • Revenue is forecast to grow slower than 20% per year.
  • 预计收入每年增长将低于20%。
  • What else are analysts forecasting for MZH?
  • 分析师对MZH还有什么预测?

Moving On:

继续前进:

Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it ideally won't be the sole piece of analysis you scrutinize for a company. DCF models are not the be-all and end-all of investment valuation. Preferably you'd apply different cases and assumptions and see how they would impact the company's valuation. For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. Can we work out why the company is trading at a discount to intrinsic value? For Nanofilm Technologies International, we've compiled three relevant elements you should further examine:

就建立投资论点而言,估值只是硬币的一面,理想情况下,它不会是你为公司仔细审查的唯一分析结果。DCF 模型不是投资估值的万能之计。最好你应用不同的案例和假设,看看它们将如何影响公司的估值。例如,公司股本成本或无风险利率的变化可能会对估值产生重大影响。我们能否弄清楚为什么公司的交易价格低于内在价值?对于Nanofilm Technologies International,我们整理了三个相关内容,你应该进一步研究

  1. Financial Health: Does MZH have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.
  2. Management:Have insiders been ramping up their shares to take advantage of the market's sentiment for MZH's future outlook? Check out our management and board analysis with insights on CEO compensation and governance factors.
  3. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!
  1. 财务健康: MZH 的资产负债表健康吗?看看我们的免费资产负债表分析,对杠杆率和风险等关键因素进行六次简单检查。
  2. 管理:内部人士是否在提高股价,以利用市场对MZH未来前景的情绪?查看我们的管理层和董事会分析,了解有关首席执行官薪酬和治理因素的见解。
  3. 其他高质量的替代品: 你喜欢一个优秀的全能选手吗?浏览我们的高品质股票互动清单,了解您可能还缺少什么!

PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every Singaporean stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.

PS。Simply Wall St每天都会更新每只新加坡股票的差价合约计算方法,因此,如果您想找到任何其他股票的内在价值,请在此处搜索。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章无意提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发