share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Algoma Steel Group Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ASTL) Recent 7.4% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Algoma Steel Group Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ASTL) Recent 7.4% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

机构所有者可能会像 Algoma Steel Group Inc. 那样采取重大行动。”s(纳斯达克股票代码:ASTL)最近下跌7.4%,加剧了一年的亏损
Simply Wall St ·  2023/05/31 06:12

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Algoma Steel Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构在Algoma Steel Group的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
  • 共有11名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有51%的所有权
  • 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Algoma Steel Group Inc. (NASDAQ:ASTL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 53% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了Algoma Steel Group Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:ASTL),了解企业的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有53%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现下跌,则损失最大)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 7.4% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 27% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Algoma Steel Group which might hurt individual investors.

上周该公司股价下跌7.4%之后,机构投资者遭受了最大的损失。这部分投资者可能特别担心目前的亏损,这使股东一年的亏损增加了27%。也被称为 “智能货币”,机构对股票价格的走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果继续下跌,机构投资者可能会被迫出售Algoma Steel Group,这可能会伤害个人投资者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Algoma Steel Group, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,更深入地研究Algoma Steel Group的每种类型的所有者。

See our latest analysis for Algoma Steel Group

查看我们对 Algoma Steel Group 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:ASTL Ownership Breakdown May 31st 2023
纳斯达克通用汽车:ASTL 所有权明细 2023 年 5 月 31 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Algoma Steel Group?

关于Algoma Steel Group,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Algoma Steel Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Algoma Steel Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Algoma Steel Group已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Algoma Steel Group的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:ASTL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 31st 2023
纳斯达克通用汽车:ASTL 收益和收入增长 2023 年 5 月 31 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 12% of Algoma Steel Group shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Bain Capital, LP is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Donald Smith & Co., Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.0% of common stock, and Maple Rock Capital Partners Inc. holds about 6.3% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。看来对冲基金拥有阿尔戈马钢铁集团12%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层或带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。我们的数据显示,Bain Capital, LP是最大的股东,已发行股票的14%。唐纳德·史密斯公司是第二大股东,拥有7.0%的普通股,而Maple Rock Capital Partners Inc.持有该公司约6.3%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记处来看,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前11名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东在所有权中拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Algoma Steel Group

阿尔戈玛钢铁集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Algoma Steel Group Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$712m, and insiders have US$45m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有Algoma Steel Group Inc的股份。它的市值仅为7.12亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值4500万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐情况。你可以点击这里查看那些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Algoma Steel Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众拥有14%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成,对Algoma Steel Group有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 14%, private equity firms could influence the Algoma Steel Group board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有14%的股份,可以影响Algoma Steel Group董事会。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的活动家。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后会被抢购一空。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Algoma Steel Group (2 make us uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了 Algoma Steel 集团有 3 个警告信号 (2 让我们感到不舒服),您应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底 这是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者的表现如何。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章无意提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发