Individual Investors Who Own 44% Along With Institutions Invested in C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Individual Investors Who Own 44% Along With Institutions Invested in C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- C3.ai's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
- 12% of C3.ai is held by insiders
- C3.ai 拥有大量的个人投资者所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
- 前25名股东拥有公司45%的股份
- C3.ai 的12%由内部人士持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了 C3.ai, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:AI),了解企业的所有权结构很重要。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为44%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 4.5% price gain, institutions also received a 39% cut.
尽管个人投资者是继上周股价上涨4.5%之后获得最大收益的群体,但机构也获得了39%的削减。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of C3.ai.
在下图中,我们放大了 C3.ai 的不同所有权组。
View our latest analysis for C3.ai
查看我们对 C3.ai 的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?
关于 C3.ai,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
We can see that C3.ai does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at C3.ai's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看出 C3.ai 确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司的很大一部分股票。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者提供的假定验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看 C3.ai 的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in C3.ai. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Thomas Siebel with 8.2% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我们注意到,对冲基金对 C3.ai 没有有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是首席执行官托马斯·西贝尔(Thomas Siebel),已发行股份占8.2%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的7.9%和6.0%。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of C3.ai
C3.ai 的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of C3.ai, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$4.6b, and insiders have US$535m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有合理比例的 C3.ai, Inc.它的市值仅为46亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值5.35亿美元的股票。这非常重要。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 44% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over C3.ai. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众(主要由个人投资者组成)拥有 44% 的所有权,对 C3.ai 有一定程度的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 6.0%, of the C3.ai stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看来私营公司拥有 C3.ai 股票的 6.0%。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有私营公司来对上市公司感兴趣,而不是以个人身份感兴趣。虽然很难得出任何粗略的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个有待进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for C3.ai you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.
虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。一个很好的例子:我们发现了 C3.ai 的 3 个警告标志 你应该知道,其中一个很重要。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但归根结底 这是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者的表现如何。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。