Can Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Maintain Its Strong Returns?
Can Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Maintain Its Strong Returns?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT).
许多投资者仍在学习分析股票时可能有用的各种指标。本文适用于那些想了解股本回报率(ROE)的人。通过边干边学,我们将研究投资回报率,以更好地了解Alliant Energy Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:LNT)。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.
股本回报率或投资回报率是股东需要考虑的重要因素,因为它可以告诉他们资本再投资的有效性。换句话说,它揭示了公司成功地将股东投资转化为利润。
View our latest analysis for Alliant Energy
查看我们对 Alliant Energy 的最新分析
How Is ROE Calculated?
ROE 是如何计算的?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
ROE 可以通过以下公式计算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营业务)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Alliant Energy is:
因此,根据上述公式,Alliant Energy的投资回报率为:
10% = US$658m ÷ US$6.5b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2023).
10% = 6.58亿美元 ¥65亿美元(基于截至2023年6月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.10 in profit.
“回报” 是企业去年获得的收入。另一种思考方式是,公司每持有价值1美元的股权,就能获得0.10美元的利润。
Does Alliant Energy Have A Good Return On Equity?
Alliant Energy的股本回报率是否良好?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. Pleasingly, Alliant Energy has a superior ROE than the average (8.1%) in the Electric Utilities industry.
通过将公司的投资回报率与行业平均水平进行比较,我们可以快速衡量其表现如何。这种方法的局限性在于,有些公司与其他公司有很大不同,即使属于相同的行业分类也是如此。令人高兴的是,Alliant Energy的投资回报率高于电力公用事业行业的平均水平(8.1%)。
That's what we like to see. Bear in mind, a high ROE doesn't always mean superior financial performance. Especially when a firm uses high levels of debt to finance its debt which may boost its ROE but the high leverage puts the company at risk. To know the 2 risks we have identified for Alliant Energy visit our risks dashboard for free.
这就是我们喜欢看到的。请记住,高投资回报率并不总是意味着卓越的财务业绩。尤其是当一家公司使用高额债务为债务融资时,这可能会提高其投资回报率,但高杠杆率却使公司面临风险。要了解我们为Alliant Energy确定的2种风险,请免费访问我们的风险仪表板。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
债务如何影响投资回报率?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
大多数公司需要来自某个地方的资金来增加利润。这些现金可能来自发行股票、留存收益或债务。在第一种和第二种情况下,投资回报率将反映这种使用现金投资业务的情况。在后一种情况下,增长所需的债务将提高回报,但不会影响股东权益。这将使投资回报率看起来比不使用债务时的投资回报率要好。
Alliant Energy's Debt And Its 10% ROE
Alliant Energy的债务及其10%的投资回报率
Alliant Energy clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.40. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
Alliant Energy显然使用大量债务来提高回报,因为它的负债权益比率为1.40。即使使用了大量债务,它的投资回报率也相当低;在我们看来,这不是一个好结果。债务确实带来了额外的风险,因此只有当一家公司从中获得可观的回报时,债务才真正值得。
Conclusion
结论
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回报率对于比较不同业务的质量很有用。能够在不负债过多的情况下获得高股本回报的公司通常质量很好。如果两家公司的债务与股权比率大致相同,而一家公司的投资回报率更高,那么我通常更喜欢投资回报率更高的那家公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是,当企业质量很高时,市场通常会以反映这一点的价格出价。重要的是要考虑其他因素,例如未来的利润增长,以及未来需要多少投资。因此,你可能想看看这张数据丰富的公司预测交互式图表。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然, 你可能会在其他地方找到一笔不错的投资。 所以来看看这个 免费的 有趣的公司名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。