Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company
Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company
Key Insights
关键见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Alliant Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 各机构在Alliant Energy的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
- 前18名股东拥有公司50%的股份
- 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现
If you want to know who really controls Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 77% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制了Alliant Energy Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:LNT),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而占有最大份额的群体是拥有77%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,将大量机构资金投资于公司通常被视为理想的特征。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Alliant Energy.
在下图中,我们放大了Alliant Energy的不同所有权群体。
Check out our latest analysis for Alliant Energy
查看我们对Alliant Energy的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alliant Energy?
关于Alliant Energy,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alliant Energy. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Alliant Energy, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所见,机构投资者持有Alliant Energy的相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过该股,他们喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看Alliant Energy过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Alliant Energy is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.3% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。Alliant Energy不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股东,持有13%的已发行股份。贝莱德公司是第二大股东,拥有9.0%的普通股,道富环球顾问公司持有该公司约5.3%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前18名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Alliant Energy
联盟能源的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Alliant Energy Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$20m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有Alliant Energy Corporation不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只希望内部人士拥有其一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值2000万美元的股票。看到至少有一些内部人所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司23%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Alliant Energy (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如说,比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现了 Alliant Energy 的 2 个警告信号(其中 1 个有点令人担忧!)你应该知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。