Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) Could Be At Risk Of Shrinking As A Company
Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) Could Be At Risk Of Shrinking As A Company
If you're looking at a mature business that's past the growth phase, what are some of the underlying trends that pop up? Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. In light of that, from a first glance at Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK), we've spotted some signs that it could be struggling, so let's investigate.
如果你看的是一个已经过了增长阶段的成熟企业,那么会出现哪些潜在趋势?衰落的企业通常有两个潜在的趋势,第一,衰退 返回 论资本使用率(ROCE)和下降情况 基础 已动用资本的百分比。这表明,该公司之所以复利股东财富,并不是因为回报率下降,净资产基础正在萎缩。有鉴于此,乍一看莫霍克工业公司(纽约证券交易所代码:MHK),我们发现了一些可能陷入困境的迹象,所以让我们来调查一下。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
了解资本使用回报率 (ROCE)
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Mohawk Industries is:
对于那些不确定ROCE是什么的人来说,它衡量的是公司从业务中使用的资本中可以产生的税前利润额。Mohawk Industries 的计算公式为:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)
0.071 = US$704m ÷ (US$13b - US$3.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.071 = 7.04 亿美元 ¥(130 亿美元至 32 亿美元) (基于截至2023年9月的过去十二个月)。
Therefore, Mohawk Industries has an ROCE of 7.1%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Consumer Durables industry average of 13%.
因此,莫霍克工业公司的投资回报率为7.1%。归根结底,这是一个低回报,其表现低于耐用消费品行业13%的平均水平。
See our latest analysis for Mohawk Industries
查看我们对 Mohawk Industries 的最新分析
In the above chart we have measured Mohawk Industries' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
在上面的图表中,我们对莫霍克工业之前的投资回报率与之前的表现进行了比较,但可以说,未来更为重要。如果你有兴趣,可以在我们关于公司分析师预测的免费报告中查看分析师的预测。
How Are Returns Trending?
退货趋势如何?
There is reason to be cautious about Mohawk Industries, given the returns are trending downwards. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 13% that they were earning five years ago. Meanwhile, capital employed in the business has stayed roughly the flat over the period. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Mohawk Industries becoming one if things continue as they have.
鉴于回报率呈下降趋势,有理由对莫霍克工业持谨慎态度。不幸的是,资本回报率已从五年前的13%有所下降。同时,在此期间,该业务的使用资本基本保持不变。这种组合可能表明一家成熟的企业仍有资金部署领域,但由于新的竞争或利润率的降低,获得的回报并不高。因此,由于这些趋势通常不利于创造多功能工厂,因此如果情况照原样继续下去,我们就等不及莫霍克工业公司成为一体。
Our Take On Mohawk Industries' ROCE
我们对莫霍克工业公司投资回报率的看法
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Long term shareholders who've owned the stock over the last five years have experienced a 24% depreciation in their investment, so it appears the market might not like these trends either. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
归根结底,相同数量资本回报率下降的趋势通常并不表示我们正在研究成长股。在过去五年中拥有该股的长期股东的投资贬值了24%,因此看来市场也可能不喜欢这些趋势。除非这些指标转向更积极的轨迹,否则我们会将目光投向其他地方。
One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with Mohawk Industries and understanding it should be part of your investment process.
还有一点需要注意,我们已经向Mohawk Industries确定了1个警告信号,并认为这应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
对于那些喜欢投资稳健公司的人,可以查看这份资产负债表稳健和股本回报率高的公司的免费清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。