share_log

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) Touches CN¥5.8b Market Cap

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) Touches CN¥5.8b Market Cap

隨着南京國威科技股份有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:688539)市值觸及58億元人民幣,擁有大量所有權的內部人士是主要的捐助者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/12/29 17:37

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in NanJing GOVA Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in NanJing GOVA Technology is 12%
  • 業內人士似乎對南京GOVA科技的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權來看
  • 前四名股東擁有公司55%的股份
  • 南京 GOVA 科技的機構所有權爲 12%

Every investor in NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

南京國華科技股份有限公司(上海證券交易所股票代碼:688539)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有58%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥5.8b market cap following a 7.0% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲7.0%後達到58億元人民幣。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NanJing GOVA Technology.

在下圖中,我們放大了南京GOVA科技的不同所有權群體。

See our latest analysis for NanJing GOVA Technology

查看我們對南京 GOVA 科技的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688539 Ownership Breakdown December 29th 2023
SHSE: 688539 所有權明細 2023 年 12 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NanJing GOVA Technology?

關於南京GOVA科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

NanJing GOVA Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NanJing GOVA Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

南京GOVA科技已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看南京GOVA科技過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688539 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 29th 2023
SHSE: 688539 2023 年 12 月 29 日收益和收入增長

NanJing GOVA Technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Weiping Li, with ownership of 18%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 12% of the stock. Biao Huang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

南京GOVA科技不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是李衛平,所有權爲18%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約14%和12%的股份。第三大股東黃彪也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現55%的股份由前四名股東持有。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的空間。

Insider Ownership Of NanJing GOVA Technology

南京 GOVA 科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own CN¥3.4b worth of shares in the CN¥5.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有南京GOVA科技有限公司一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。這意味着他們擁有這家58億元人民幣公司價值34億元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in NanJing GOVA Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有南京GOVA科技28%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NanJing GOVA Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - NanJing GOVA Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解南京GOVA科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例-南京GOVA科技有1個我們認爲你應該注意的警告標誌。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論