Is Greif, Inc.'s (NYSE:GEF) ROE Of 18% Impressive?
Is Greif, Inc.'s (NYSE:GEF) ROE Of 18% Impressive?
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine Greif, Inc. (NYSE:GEF), by way of a worked example.
我們能做的最好的投資之一是我們自己的知識和技能。考慮到這一點,本文將探討如何使用股本回報率(ROE)來更好地了解業務。我們將使用投資回報率來考察格瑞夫公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:GEF),舉一個有效的例子。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
股本回報率或投資回報率是股東要考慮的重要因素,因爲它告訴他們資本再投資的有效性。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。
Check out our latest analysis for Greif
查看我們對 Greif 的最新分析
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
投資回報率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Greif is:
因此,根據上述公式,Greif的投資回報率爲:
18% = US$379m ÷ US$2.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to October 2023).
18% = 3.79億美元 ÷ 21億美元(基於截至2023年10月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.18.
“回報” 是過去十二個月的利潤。因此,這意味着公司每投資1美元,就會產生0.18美元的利潤。
Does Greif Have A Good ROE?
格雷夫的投資回報率不錯嗎?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. You can see in the graphic below that Greif has an ROE that is fairly close to the average for the Packaging industry (18%).
確定公司股本回報率是否不錯的一種簡單方法是將其與該行業的平均水平進行比較。這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司與其他公司有很大不同,即使在相同的行業分類中也是如此。你可以在下圖中看到,格雷夫的投資回報率與包裝行業的平均水平(18%)相當接近。
That's neither particularly good, nor bad. While at least the ROE is not lower than the industry, its still worth checking what role the company's debt plays as high debt levels relative to equity may also make the ROE appear high. If so, this increases its exposure to financial risk. To know the 2 risks we have identified for Greif visit our risks dashboard for free.
這既不是特別好,也不是特別糟糕。儘管至少投資回報率不低於該行業,但仍值得檢查該公司的債務起了什麼作用,因爲相對於股權的高債務水平也可能使投資回報率顯得很高。如果是這樣,這會增加其金融風險敞口。要了解我們爲Greif確定的兩種風險,請免費訪問我們的風險控制面板。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
爲什麼在考慮投資回報率時應該考慮債務
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。投資現金可以來自上一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在前兩個案例中,投資回報率將涵蓋這種資本用於增長的用途。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產。因此,使用債務可以提高投資回報率,儘管可以隱喻地說,暴風雨天氣會帶來額外的風險。
Combining Greif's Debt And Its 18% Return On Equity
合併格雷夫的債務及其18%的股本回報率
Greif does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.05. There's no doubt its ROE is decent, but the very high debt the company carries is not too exciting to see. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
格雷夫確實使用大量債務來增加回報。它的負債權益比率爲1.05。毫無疑問,其投資回報率不錯,但該公司揹負的巨額債務並不令人興奮。投資者應該仔細考慮如果一家公司無法如此輕易地借款,其表現會如何,因爲信貸市場確實會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回報率是我們比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。一家能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被視爲高質量的企業。如果兩家公司的債權與股本水平大致相同,而一家的投資回報率更高,我通常更喜歡投資回報率更高的公司。
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
話雖如此,儘管投資回報率是衡量業務質量的有用指標,但你必須考慮一系列因素來確定購買股票的正確價格。利潤增長率與股票價格所反映的預期相比,是一個特別重要的考慮因素。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
Of course Greif may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.
當然,格雷夫可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,您不妨免費查看其他投資回報率高、負債率低的公司的名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。