share_log

Richardson Electronics' (NASDAQ:RELL) Shareholders Have More To Worry About Than Only Soft Earnings

Richardson Electronics' (NASDAQ:RELL) Shareholders Have More To Worry About Than Only Soft Earnings

理查森电子(纳斯达克股票代码:RELL)的股东需要担心的不仅仅是疲软的收益
Simply Wall St ·  01/18 05:35

The market wasn't impressed with the soft earnings from Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (NASDAQ:RELL) recently. Our analysis has found some reasons to be concerned, beyond the weak headline numbers.

理查森电子有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:RELL)最近的疲软收益并没有给市场留下深刻的印象。我们的分析发现,除了疲软的标题数字外,还有一些令人担忧的理由。

Check out our latest analysis for Richardson Electronics

查看我们对理查森电子的最新分析

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:RELL Earnings and Revenue History January 18th 2024
NASDAQGS: RELL 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 1 月 18 日

An Unusual Tax Situation

不寻常的税收状况

Richardson Electronics reported a tax benefit of US$1.0m, which is well worth noting. This is of course a bit out of the ordinary, given it is more common for companies to be paying tax than receiving tax benefits! The receipt of a tax benefit is obviously a good thing, on its own. However, the devil in the detail is that these kind of benefits only impact in the year they are booked, and are often one-off in nature. In the likely event the tax benefit is not repeated, we'd expect to see its statutory profit levels drop, at least in the absence of strong growth. While we think it's good that the company has booked a tax benefit, it does mean that there's every chance the statutory profit will come in a lot higher than it would be if the income was adjusted for one-off factors.

理查森电子报告了100万美元的税收优惠,值得一提。这当然有点不寻常,因为公司纳税比获得税收优惠更为普遍!获得税收优惠本身显然是一件好事。但是,细节上的问题在于,此类福利仅在预订当年有影响,而且本质上通常是一次性的。如果税收优惠可能不重演,我们预计其法定利润水平将下降,至少在没有强劲增长的情况下是如此。尽管我们认为公司获得税收优惠是件好事,但这确实意味着法定利润很有可能远高于根据一次性因素调整收入时的法定利润。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。

Our Take On Richardson Electronics' Profit Performance

我们对理查森电子利润表现的看法

Richardson Electronics reported that it received a tax benefit, rather than paid tax, in its last report. Given that sort of benefit is not recurring, a focus on the statutory profit might make the company seem better than it really is. Because of this, we think that it may be that Richardson Electronics' statutory profits are better than its underlying earnings power. In further bad news, its earnings per share decreased in the last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. If you want to do dive deeper into Richardson Electronics, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. For example - Richardson Electronics has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

理查森电子在上一份报告中报告说,它获得了税收优惠,而不是纳税。鉴于这种好处不是经常性的,专注于法定利润可能会使公司看起来比实际情况更好。因此,我们认为理查森电子的法定利润可能好于其基础盈利能力。另一个坏消息是,其每股收益在去年有所下降。本文的目标是评估我们在多大程度上可以依靠法定收益来反映公司的潜力,但还有很多需要考虑的地方。如果你想更深入地研究理查森电子,你还需要研究它目前面临的风险。例如,理查森电子有两个警告标志,我们认为你应该注意。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Richardson Electronics' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

这份报告只研究了揭示理查森电子利润性质的单一因素。但是,还有很多其他方法可以让你对公司的看法。有些人认为高股本回报率是优质业务的好兆头。虽然可能需要你进行一些研究,但你可能会发现这份免费收集的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发