Both Company Controlled Foundation Who Control a Good Portion of Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 3.7% Decrease
Both Company Controlled Foundation Who Control a Good Portion of Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 3.7% Decrease
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Hormel Foods by company controlled foundation implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 2 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 公司控制的基金会对荷美尔食品的重大控制意味着公众有更大的权力影响管理和治理相关决策
- 前2名股东拥有公司53%的股份
- 业内人士最近一直在抛售
Every investor in Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is company controlled foundation. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
荷美尔食品公司(纽约证券交易所代码:HRL)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。持有公司股份最多的集团是公司控制的基金会,准确地说约为47%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
While institutions who own 42% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$17b last week,company controlled foundation took the most losses.
尽管上周市值跌至170亿美元后,持有42%的机构承受了压力,但公司控制的基金会遭受的损失最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hormel Foods, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究荷美尔食品的每种类型的所有者。
View our latest analysis for Hormel Foods
查看我们对荷美尔食品的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240122/0-25cddc4371cbb85a30fb40eee171c5be-0-7886d38247fa2986b9f64306169190f3.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hormel Foods?
关于荷美尔食品,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会变得更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会注册一些机构,尤其是在它们成长的情况下。
We can see that Hormel Foods does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hormel Foods' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到,荷美尔食品确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看荷美尔食品的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240122/0-25cddc4371cbb85a30fb40eee171c5be-1-c74972a4090603e248d5e53deecf8e61.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hormel Foods. The company's largest shareholder is The Hormel Foundation, Endowment Arm, with ownership of 47%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
对冲基金在荷美尔食品的股票不多。该公司的最大股东是荷美尔基金会捐赠分部,所有权为47%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约6.4%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有5.1%的所有权。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 53% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,两名最大股东通过其53%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解公众舆论也是有意义的。有很多分析师报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Hormel Foods
荷美尔食品的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hormel Foods Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$52m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有荷美尔食品公司不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共拥有价值5200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员拥有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Hormel Foods. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有荷美尔食品11%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hormel Foods better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Hormel Foods that you should be aware of before investing here.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解荷美尔食品,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了荷美尔食品的一个警告信号,在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。