ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002758) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002758) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in ZJAMP Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 54% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 私營公司在ZJAMP集團擁有大量所有權,這表明他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
- 54% 的業務由前三名股東持有
- 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會
A look at the shareholders of ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002758) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看ZJAMP集團有限公司(深圳證券交易所:002758)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。私營公司擁有54%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to CN¥5.0b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着上週市值跌至50億元人民幣,私營公司面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東群體。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ZJAMP Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究ZJAMP集團的每種所有者。
See our latest analysis for ZJAMP Group
查看我們對 ZJAMP 集團的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240124/0-420fefefcb8196eb92ae59a940db05c2-0-87e36fbf16a2a6dab0e247972bac10c9.png/big)
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZJAMP Group?
關於ZJAMP集團,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. ZJAMP Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。ZJAMP Group可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能只是沒有仔細研究該業務。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240124/0-420fefefcb8196eb92ae59a940db05c2-1-95ac6d07965ea8cec8affba9cc46fc02.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in ZJAMP Group. The company's largest shareholder is ZJAMP Holdings Group Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 30%. The second and third largest shareholders are Zhejiang Tai'antai Investment Consulting Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) and Zhejiang Xinghe Group Co., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 12%.
對沖基金在ZJAMP集團的股份不多。該公司的最大股東是ZJAMP Holdings Group Co., Ltd,擁有30%的所有權。第二和第三大股東是浙江泰安泰投資諮詢合夥企業(有限合夥企業)和浙江興和集團有限公司,持有與其同等數量的股份,爲12%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 54% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其54%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of ZJAMP Group
ZJAMP 集團的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.0b, and insiders have CN¥415m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有ZJAMP集團有限公司的部分股份。它的市值僅爲50億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值4.15億元人民幣的股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in ZJAMP Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有ZJAMP集團37%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司54%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with ZJAMP Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向ZJAMP集團確定了3個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。