Investors in LivaNova (NASDAQ:LIVN) Have Unfortunately Lost 45% Over the Last Five Years
Investors in LivaNova (NASDAQ:LIVN) Have Unfortunately Lost 45% Over the Last Five Years
The main aim of stock picking is to find the market-beating stocks. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in LivaNova PLC (NASDAQ:LIVN), since the last five years saw the share price fall 45%.
選股的主要目的是尋找市場領先的股票。但是,幾乎每個投資者都肯定會有表現過硬和表現不佳的股票。目前,一些股東可能會質疑他們對LivaNova PLC(納斯達克股票代碼:LIVN)的投資,因爲在過去五年中,股價下跌了45%。
So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.
因此,讓我們來看看公司的長期表現是否與基礎業務的進展一致。
See our latest analysis for LivaNova
查看我們對 LivaNova 的最新分析
While LivaNova made a small profit, in the last year, we think that the market is probably more focussed on the top line growth at the moment. Generally speaking, we'd consider a stock like this alongside loss-making companies, simply because the quantum of the profit is so low. For shareholders to have confidence a company will grow profits significantly, it must grow revenue.
儘管LivaNova在去年獲得了小額利潤,但我們認爲目前市場可能更加關注收入增長。總的來說,我們會將這樣的股票與虧損公司一起考慮,這僅僅是因爲利潤量太低了。爲了使股東有信心公司將大幅增加利潤,就必須增加收入。
In the last five years LivaNova saw its revenue shrink by 0.7% per year. That's not what investors generally want to see. The stock hasn't done well for shareholders in the last five years, falling 8%, annualized. But it doesn't surprise given the falling revenue. Without profits, its hard to see how shareholders win if the revenue keeps falling.
在過去的五年中,LivaNova的收入每年減少0.7%。這不是投資者普遍希望看到的。在過去五年中,該股對股東的表現不佳,按年計算下跌了8%。但是,考慮到收入的下降,這並不奇怪。沒有利潤,如果收入持續下降,就很難看出股東如何獲勝。
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖描述了收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖片即可顯示確切的數值)。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240125/0-37c008b9293286eef793aab8d50a6d26-0-d420205a75a632500a5e5a43293a93bd.png/big)
We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on LivaNova
我們很高興地向大家報告,首席執行官的薪酬比資本相似公司的大多數首席執行官要適中。但是,儘管首席執行官的薪酬總是值得檢查的,但真正重要的問題是公司未來能否增加收益。這份顯示分析師預測的免費報告應該可以幫助您對LivaNova形成看法
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
LivaNova shareholders are down 13% for the year, but the market itself is up 21%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 8% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for LivaNova you should be aware of.
LivaNova的股東今年下跌了13%,但市場本身上漲了21%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在過於感興趣之前看到企業基本指標的改善。遺憾的是,去年的業績結束了糟糕的表現,股東在五年內每年面臨8%的總虧損。總的來說,長期股價疲軟可能是一個壞兆頭,儘管逆勢投資者可能希望研究該股以期出現轉機。我發現將長期股價視爲業務績效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的LivaNova的1個警告信號。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.
當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,請看一下我們預計收益將增加的這份免費公司名單。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。