Returns On Capital At Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Have Stalled
Returns On Capital At Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Have Stalled
What trends should we look for it we want to identify stocks that can multiply in value over the long term? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Although, when we looked at Ecolab (NYSE:ECL), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.
我们应该寻找哪些趋势?我们想确定可以长期价值成倍增长的股票?除其他外,我们希望看到两件事;首先,成长 返回 论资本使用率(ROCE),其次是公司的扩张 金额 所用资本的比例。如果你看到这一点,这通常意味着它是一家拥有良好商业模式和大量盈利再投资机会的公司。但是,当我们查看Ecolab(纽约证券交易所代码:ECL)时,它似乎并没有勾选所有这些方框。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本使用回报率(ROCE):这是什么?
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. To calculate this metric for Ecolab, this is the formula:
为了澄清一下你是否不确定,ROCE是评估公司从投资于其业务的资本中获得多少税前收入(按百分比计算)的指标。要计算 Ecolab 的这个指标,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)
0.12 = US$2.1b ÷ (US$22b - US$4.6b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.12 = 21亿美元 ÷(220亿美元-46亿美元) (基于截至2023年9月的过去十二个月)。
Thus, Ecolab has an ROCE of 12%. That's a relatively normal return on capital, and it's around the 10% generated by the Chemicals industry.
因此,Ecolab的投资回报率为12%。这是相对正常的资本回报率,大约是化工行业产生的10%。
In the above chart we have measured Ecolab's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
在上图中,我们将Ecolab先前的投资回报率与之前的表现进行了比较,但可以说,未来更为重要。如果您有兴趣,可以在我们关于公司分析师预测的免费报告中查看分析师的预测。
What Does the ROCE Trend For Ecolab Tell Us?
Ecolab的投资回报率趋势告诉我们什么?
Things have been pretty stable at Ecolab, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Ecolab in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. This probably explains why Ecolab is paying out 32% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Unless businesses have highly compelling growth opportunities, they'll typically return some money to shareholders.
Ecolab的情况一直相当稳定,在过去五年中,其资本使用率和资本回报率基本保持不变。具有这些特征的企业往往是成熟而稳定的运营,因为它们已经过了增长阶段。因此,除非我们看到Ecolab在投资回报率方面发生重大变化并进行额外投资,否则我们不会屏住呼吸成为一家多袋公司。这也许可以解释为什么Ecolab以股息的形式将其收入的32%支付给股东。除非企业有极具吸引力的增长机会,否则他们通常会向股东返还一些钱。
What We Can Learn From Ecolab's ROCE
我们可以从 Ecolab 的 ROCE 中学到什么
In summary, Ecolab isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. And with the stock having returned a mere 32% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. So if you're looking for a multi-bagger, the underlying trends indicate you may have better chances elsewhere.
总而言之,Ecolab并没有复合收益,而是在使用相同数量的资本的情况下产生了稳定的回报。而且,由于该股在过去五年中仅向股东回报了32%,因此你可以说他们意识到了这些乏善可陈的趋势。因此,如果你正在寻找一款多袋装车,潜在的趋势表明你在其他地方的机会可能更大。
One more thing, we've spotted 2 warning signs facing Ecolab that you might find interesting.
还有一件事,我们发现了面向 Ecolab 的 2 个警告标志,你可能会觉得有趣。
While Ecolab isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
尽管Ecolab的回报率并不高,但请查看这份免费清单,列出了资产负债表稳健的股本回报率高的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。