Read This Before Judging Spring Airlines Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601021) ROE
Read This Before Judging Spring Airlines Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601021) ROE
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Spring Airlines Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601021), by way of a worked example.
儘管一些投資者已經精通財務指標(帽子提示),但本文適用於那些想了解股本回報率(ROE)及其重要性的人。舉一個有效的例子,我們將使用投資回報率來考察春秋航空有限公司(SHSE: 601021)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
股本回報率或投資回報率是用於評估公司管理層利用公司資本效率的關鍵指標。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
ROE 的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Spring Airlines is:
因此,根據上述公式,春秋航空的投資回報率爲:
8.5% = CN¥1.4b ÷ CN¥16b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
8.5% = 14億元人民幣 ¥160億元人民幣(基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. That means that for every CN¥1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated CN¥0.08 in profit.
“回報” 是過去十二個月的利潤。這意味着,每持有價值1元人民幣的股東權益,該公司就會產生0.08元人民幣的利潤。
Does Spring Airlines Have A Good Return On Equity?
春秋航空有良好的股本回報率嗎?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Spring Airlines has a lower ROE than the average (20%) in the Airlines industry.
通過將公司的投資回報率與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現如何。但是,這種方法僅在粗略檢查時有用,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中確實存在很大差異。從下圖中可以明顯看出,春秋航空的投資回報率低於航空行業的平均水平(20%)。
That certainly isn't ideal. That being said, a low ROE is not always a bad thing, especially if the company has low leverage as this still leaves room for improvement if the company were to take on more debt. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved.
這當然不理想。話雖如此,低投資回報率並不總是一件壞事,尤其是在公司的槓桿率低的情況下,因爲如果公司承擔更多債務,這仍有改進的餘地。鑑於所涉及的風險,高債務水平和低投資回報率的公司是我們希望避免的組合。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務如何影響投資回報率?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。投資現金可以來自上一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。對於第一和第二種選擇,投資回報率將反映這種對現金增長的使用。在後一種情況下,使用債務將提高回報,但不會改變權益。通過這種方式,儘管企業的核心經濟保持不變,但債務的使用將提高投資回報率。
Combining Spring Airlines' Debt And Its 8.5% Return On Equity
結合春秋航空的債務及其8.5%的股本回報率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Spring Airlines, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.31. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
值得注意的是,春秋航空大量使用債務,導致其負債權益比率爲1.31。即使使用了巨額債務,其投資回報率也相當低;在我們看來,這不是一個好結果。債務確實會帶來額外的風險,因此只有當公司從中獲得可觀的回報時,債務才是真正值得的。
Summary
摘要
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率是我們可以比較不同公司的業務質量的一種方式。能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被視爲高質量的企業。如果兩家公司的投資回報率相同,那麼我通常更喜歡負債較少的公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是,當企業質量很高時,市場通常會以反映這一點的價格出價。還必須考慮利潤可能增長的速度,相對於當前價格所反映的利潤增長預期。因此,你可能想看看這張數據豐富的公司預測交互式圖表。
But note: Spring Airlines may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.
但請注意:春秋航空可能不是最好的買入股票。因此,來看看這份投資回報率高、負債率低的有趣公司的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。