share_log

Swee Teo Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688018) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 5.6%last Week

Swee Teo Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688018) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 5.6%last Week

Swee Teo 樂信系統(上海)有限公司's(SHSE: 688018)首席執行官是最看漲的內部人士,他們的股票價值上週上漲了5.6%
Simply Wall St ·  02/08 19:41

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Espressif Systems (Shanghai)'s growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • 33% of Espressif Systems (Shanghai) is held by Institutions
  • 業內人士似乎對樂信系統(上海)的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
  • 共有5名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 樂信系統(上海)33% 的股份由機構持有

If you want to know who really controls Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688018), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 41% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了樂信系統(上海)有限公司(SHSE: 688018),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人內部人士持有41%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥7.1b market cap following a 5.6% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲5.6%後達到71億元人民幣。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Espressif Systems (Shanghai).

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於樂信系統(上海)的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688018 Ownership Breakdown February 9th 2024
SHSE: 688018 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Espressif Systems (Shanghai)?

關於樂信系統(上海),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Espressif Systems (Shanghai). This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Espressif Systems (Shanghai)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有樂信系統(上海)的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到樂信系統(上海)的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688018 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 9th 2024
SHSE: 688018 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 9 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Espressif Systems (Shanghai). The company's CEO Swee Teo is the largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Shinvest Holding Ltd. and Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Limited, Asset Management Arm, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 2.8%.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對樂信系統(上海)進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官Swee Teo是最大股東,已發行股份爲41%。第二和第三大股東是Shinvest Holding Ltd.和香港交易及結算所有限公司資產管理部門,持有與其同等數量的股份,爲2.8%。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現前五名股東持有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Espressif Systems (Shanghai)

樂信系統(上海)的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥7.1b, and insiders have CN¥2.9b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有樂信系統(上海)有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲71億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值29億元人民幣的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Espressif Systems (Shanghai). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

樂鑫科技(上海)擁有 21% 的所有權,公衆對樂信系統(上海)有一定程度的影響力,主要是個人投資者。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 5.2%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的5.2%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果內部人士等關聯方對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Espressif Systems (Shanghai) better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解樂信系統(上海),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論