DBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688023) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 59% Loss Over the Past Year
DBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688023) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 59% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DBAPPSecurity's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- 13% of DBAPPSecurity is held by insiders
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,dbappSecurity的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 51% 的業務由前 8 名股東持有
- dbappSecurity 的 13% 由內部人士持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of DBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688023), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 40% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了DBAppSecurity有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:688023),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲40%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 30% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 59%.
機構投資者將對上週股價上漲30%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的59%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DBAPPSecurity.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於DBAppSecurity的哪些信息。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240213/0-db68766c4572564e330a5fc00527e6de-0-5abba92f2989a5423851d72a664f0a89.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DBAPPSecurity?
關於dbAppSecurity,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in DBAPPSecurity. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DBAPPSecurity, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所見,機構投資者在DBAppSecurity中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下dbAppSecurity過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240213/0-db68766c4572564e330a5fc00527e6de-1-d19c2c1cb10e18e2443a29f18358e0da.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DBAPPSecurity. Our data shows that Yuan Fan is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對DBAppSecurity進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,袁帆是最大股東,已發行股份的13%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的10%和6.8%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前8名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of DBAPPSecurity
dbappSecurity 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in DBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥714m stake in this CN¥5.5b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有DBAppSecurity有限公司的大量股份。業內人士在這項55億元的業務中持有7.14億加元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DBAPPSecurity. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有25%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對DBAppSecurity有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With a stake of 10%, private equity firms could influence the DBAPPSecurity board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權公司持有10%的股份,可能會影響DBAppSecurity董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 11%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有該公司11%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for DBAPPSecurity that you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了dbAppSecurity的1個警告信號,你應該注意這一點。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。