A Closer Look At Celanese Corporation's (NYSE:CE) Impressive ROE
A Closer Look At Celanese Corporation's (NYSE:CE) Impressive ROE
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE).
儘管一些投資者已經精通財務指標(帽子提示),但本文適用於那些想了解股本回報率(ROE)及其重要性的人。爲了使課程以實用爲基礎,我們將使用投資回報率來更好地了解塞拉尼斯公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CE)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
股本回報率或投資回報率是用於評估公司管理層利用公司資本效率的關鍵指標。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
ROE 的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Celanese is:
因此,根據上述公式,塞拉尼斯的投資回報率爲:
29% = US$2.0b ÷ US$6.9b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
29% = 20億美元 ÷ 69億美元(基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.29 in profit.
“回報” 是每年的利潤。另一種思考方式是,每持有價值1美元的股權,該公司就能獲得0.29美元的利潤。
Does Celanese Have A Good ROE?
塞拉尼斯的投資回報率不錯嗎?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Celanese has a better ROE than the average (13%) in the Chemicals industry.
可以說,評估公司投資回報率的最簡單方法是將其與行業平均水平進行比較。但是,這種方法僅在粗略檢查時有用,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中確實存在很大差異。如下圖所示,塞拉尼斯的投資回報率高於化工行業的平均水平(13%)。
That's clearly a positive. Bear in mind, a high ROE doesn't always mean superior financial performance. A higher proportion of debt in a company's capital structure may also result in a high ROE, where the high debt levels could be a huge risk . You can see the 3 risks we have identified for Celanese by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.
這顯然是積極的。請記住,高投資回報率並不總是意味着卓越的財務業績。公司資本結構中債務比例的增加也可能導致較高的投資回報率,而高債務水平可能構成巨大的風險。您可以訪問我們的網站,查看我們爲塞拉尼斯人確定的三種風險 風險儀表板 在我們的平台上免費使用。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
債務對股本回報率的重要性
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。這些現金可能來自發行股票、留存收益或債務。對於第一和第二種選擇,投資回報率將反映這種對現金增長的使用。在後一種情況下,使用債務將提高回報,但不會改變權益。通過這種方式,儘管企業的核心經濟保持不變,但債務的使用將提高投資回報率。
Celanese's Debt And Its 29% ROE
塞拉尼斯的債務及其29%的投資回報率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Celanese, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.95. While no doubt that its ROE is impressive, we would have been even more impressed had the company achieved this with lower debt. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
值得注意的是,塞拉尼斯人大量使用債務,導致其負債權益比率爲1.95。儘管毫無疑問,其投資回報率令人印象深刻,但如果該公司以較低的債務實現這一目標,我們會給我們留下更深刻的印象。投資者應該仔細考慮如果一家公司無法如此輕易地借款,其表現會如何,因爲信貸市場確實會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率是衡量企業創造利潤並將其返還給股東的能力的有用指標。能夠在不負債過多的情況下獲得高股本回報的公司通常質量很好。如果兩家公司的投資回報率相同,那麼我通常更喜歡負債較少的公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但是,當企業質量很高時,市場通常會以反映這一點的價格對其進行出價。相對於當前價格所反映的利潤增長預期,還必須考慮利潤可能的增長速度。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於分析師對公司的預測的免費報告。
But note: Celanese may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.
但請注意:塞拉尼斯可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,來看看這份投資回報率高、負債率低的有趣公司的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。